Skip to content

Strange output to terminal on Sierra #359

Closed

Description

@chdiza

The following cryptic message showed up on the terminal in Sierra, around the time that I did :set nofu in MacVim.

2016-09-21 23:09:21.564 MacVim[10082:27655] A regular control size progress indicator <PSMProgressIndicator: 0x7fb66cef8a40> with the frame size for small control size detected.  Please use -setControlSize: to explicitly specify NSSmallControlSize

I don't know what that means, but I figured it would be best to post it here in case someone does.

Activity

  1. camwright commented on Oct 3, 2016

    @camwright

    I'm getting similar issues.

  2. vdeep commented on Jan 20, 2018

    @vdeep

    Similar issue here

    2018-01-20 12:45:20.007 MacVim[2357:78529] *** Assertion failure in +[LUTextAccessor rangeOfAddressInString:forRange:], /BuildRoot/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/Lookup/Lookup-239/Framework/Classes/LUTextAccessor.m:334
    2018-01-20 12:45:20.007 MacVim[2357:78529] Lookup: Unhandled exception 'NSInternalInconsistencyException' caught in +[LULookupDefinitionModule _focusTermUsingQueue:handler:]
    2018-01-20 12:45:21.895 MacVim[2357:78529] *** Assertion failure in +[LUTextAccessor rangeOfAddressInString:forRange:], /BuildRoot/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/Lookup/Lookup-239/Framework/Classes/LUTextAccessor.m:334
    2018-01-20 12:45:21.895 MacVim[2357:78529] Lookup: Unhandled exception 'NSInternalInconsistencyException' caught in +[LULookupDefinitionModule _focusTermUsingQueue:handler:]
    
  3. alanning commented on Aug 18, 2018

    @alanning

    macOS High Sierra v10.13.6

    2018-08-17 19:44:09.859 MacVim[4048:87262] A regular control size progress indicator <PSMProgressIndicator: 0x7f8a6cfe4660> with the frame size for small control size detected.  Please use -setControlSize: to explicitly specify NSSmallControlSize
    

    Not sure why it happens but only occurs sometimes. Displayed in the terminal window that I launched vim from.

  4. eirnym commented on May 18, 2019

    @eirnym
    Contributor

    the most such messages are hidden now. Please, revisit the issue

  5. eirnym commented on Aug 18, 2019

    @eirnym
    Contributor

    I'd combine all such messages in the same issue. It's be better when we'll have a checklist and know when issue can be marked as done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions