`static final` field plus a refinement gives a spurious "Invalid ghost declaration"

[CatarinaGamboa]

Description

A private static final int field used as an argument to a refined parameter produces a syntax error about ghost declarations, although the code declares no ghost.

Minimal reproducer

import liquidjava.specification.Refinement;

public class Repro {
    private static final int BUFFER = 64;

    static void use(@Refinement("_ > 0") int n) {}

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        use(BUFFER);
    }
}

Expected

Correct! Passed Verification. (BUFFER == 64 > 0).

Actual

Running LiquidJava on: <repro dir>

Syntax Error: Invalid ghost declaration, expected e.g. @Ghost("int size")

Reproduced on main at 8816186 (liquidjava-verifier 0.0.35), and on 0.0.33.

Context

Found while turning real open-source Java code into study examples for the error-message study: real code hits this constantly, so the examples have to be rewritten around it or cannot be verified. Named constants are the idiomatic way to write these values, so examples had to replace them with literals.