You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
The eight providers are not equally first-class, and only docs/ceilings.md says so #577
README.md calls all eight providers first-class. docs/ceilings.md records what each one actually reaches, and the spread is wide:
Reading
Providers that have it
Full usage readout (tokens, context window, cost)
Claude Code, Codex
Cost only
oh-my-pi, opencode, Crush
Context only
Kiro CLI, whose spend is metered in credits
No transcript usage at all
Antigravity, Cursor CLI
Plan gauge
Claude Code, Codex
Session state, and with it the last turn, the turn ring, the interrupt reading and keep-awake
all but Crush and Cursor CLI
Hands-on time counted from a turn nobody touched
all but Crush and Cursor CLI
Palette search and recap over the conversation
all but Antigravity and Cursor CLI
Hard invariant 5 says a session feature is designed against all eight and that a deliberate gap is written down in the same pull request. Every gap above is deliberate and every one of them is written down. The problem is where: docs/ceilings.md is a contributor document, so a user who picks Cursor CLI learns the shape of their install one absent feature at a time, and an empty pane never says whether the provider reported nothing or lich drew nothing.
What done looks like
A support matrix in README.md beside the provider list, written in what the user sees (what the footer carries, whether the Review tab has a last turn, whether the machine stays awake), never in lich's internals.
The word first-class either earned or spent. Two providers with no transcript reader are not the same product as Claude Code, and the README is where a stranger decides.
Where a surface draws nothing because the provider reports nothing, it says so once. FooterSession already renders nothing rather than a zero, which is right for a footer and less right for a Review tab whose switch simply never appears.
Open
Does the matrix live only in README.md, or also in Settings › Providers where the binary is chosen, so the trade-off is visible at the moment of choosing?
Antigravity and Cursor CLI file their conversations in SQLite lich has no reader for, and neither schema is a contract anybody promised to keep. Is writing those two readers part of closing this, or is the matrix the answer and the gap stays?
Activity