Repository navigation
Privacy Manifest #546
Description
Activity
I don’t know that a privacy manifest is needed for Swifter. I don’t think the library hits any privacy issues (unlike those on Apple’s list of SDKs requiring privacy manifests; linked in the original comment).
SDKs with privacy issues (therefore requiring a privacy manifest) are those that take any user data, or define any tokens tied to a user, or track users’ activity (such as website visits). Swifter does none of that. Our apps using Swifter may or may not hit privacy issues, depending on what we have them do, but Swifter itself does not (as far as I’m aware).
According to the apple docs, specifically the Reason API:
Some APIs that your app uses to deliver its core functionality — in code you write or included in a third-party SDK — have the potential of being misused to access device signals to try to identify the device or user, also known as fingerprinting. Regardless of whether a user gives your app permission to track, fingerprinting is not allowed. Describe the reasons your app or third-party SDK on iOS, iPadOS, tvOS, visionOS, or watchOS uses these APIs, and check that your app or third-party SDK only uses the APIs for the expected reasons.
Swifter does use the stat timestamp system api here:
swifter/Xcode/Sources/String+File.swift
Line 101 in 1e4f51c
return stat.st_mode & S_IFMT == S_IFDIR I believe this requires a privacy manifest file from my understanding which will bubble up to the main project's privacy manifest.
The function with that code is:
public func directory() throws -> Bool { return try self.withStat { if let stat = $0 { return stat.st_mode & S_IFMT == S_IFDIR } return false } }
Which calls through to:
private func withStat<T>(_ closure: ((stat?) throws -> T)) throws -> T { return try self.withCString({ var statBuffer = stat() if stat($0, &statBuffer) == 0 { return try closure(statBuffer) } if errno == ENOENT { return try closure(nil) } throw FileError.error(errno) }) }
The
directory()function seems to only be used in one place, Sources/Files.swift:directoryBrowser(). It’s not entirely clear to me, but that one usage seems to be just checking if the filepath is a readable directory?public func directoryBrowser(_ dir: String) -> ((HttpRequest) -> HttpResponse) { return { request in guard let (_, value) = request.params.first else { return HttpResponse.notFound } let filePath = dir + String.pathSeparator + value do { guard try filePath.exists() else { return .notFound } if try filePath.directory() { // ⬅️ ⭐️ CALL TO directory() var files = try filePath.files() files.sort(by: {$0.lowercased() < $1.lowercased()}) return scopes { html { body { table(files) { file in tr { td { a { href = request.path + "/" + file inner = file } } } } } } }(request) } else { guard let file = try? filePath.openForReading() else { return .notFound } return .raw(200, "OK", [:], { writer in try? writer.write(file) file.close() }) } } catch { return HttpResponse.internalServerError } } }
If I am correct that it’s just checking that the directory is readable, then perhaps an alternative approach may be taken that doesn’t call the
statfunction that seems to be triggering Apple’s privacy restrictions?Good stuff, I believe it would easier to just add the privacy manifest and keep the
statcall, not sure how else to check if the directory exists without a system API call.I attempted to create a PR: #550
+1 on this
From Apple docs:
Could you please add a privacy manifest for this library?