This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2017. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2017. It is now read-only.
Improve coverage of ABP cosmetic filters #276
Description
A meta issue just to keep track of changes related to coverage improvement of ABP cosmetic filters.
Currently coverage is (based on latest EasyList):
- 20866 accepted
- 3221 rejected
- coverage: 86.6%
[To do: Create a list of selectors to address, starting with most-used first]
Activity
gorhill commentedon May 19, 2014
mail.google.com##.nH.adC > .nH > .nH > .u5 > .azNis not collapsed. I expected that I would need a mutation observer. I think I will just merge the content script for cosmetic filters with the main content script which already implements a mutation observer. This one element hiding filter might be the most sought after.this addresses #276: now filters applied when DOM mutates
gorhill commentedon May 19, 2014
fded043 takes care of embedded gmail ads (as far as I could test with my never-use gmail account).
Fixed bugs related to changes for #276
gorhill commentedon May 19, 2014
Found 2,908 matches for cosmetic filters in the form:
Given that these filters are narrowed to a single domain, it's quite easy to implement. Will call them
FilterElementHostname, and that should bring coverage to 98.7% before the end of the day.gorhill commentedon May 19, 2014
With 83e213c, coverage is 99.0%:
gorhill commentedon May 21, 2014
Latest fine tuning work, d734e42, improved coverage to 99.4%: