This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2023. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
Fix coding of LE in Case 2E in xchgAPDUExtended - #180
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Commit 1497409 fixed the coding of LC if LC==0, but wrongly encodes the LE field: In the case 2E (LC == 0, LE > 0), the LE value has to be coded on 3 bytes with a leading zero byte. This commit resolves this issue.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Commit 1497409 fixed the coding of LC if LC==0, but wrongly encodes the LE field: In the case 2E (LC == 0, LE > 0), the LE value has to be coded on 3 bytes with a leading zero byte. This commit resolves this issue.