Skip to content

docs(gh-aw): comprehensive guide update — slash commands, fast-path risks, implement vs @copilot, review gap - #1722

Merged
bradygaster merged 2 commits into
devfrom
bradygaster-pao-document-gh-aw-guide
Aug 16, 2026
Merged

bradygaster merged 2 commits into
devfrom
bradygaster-pao-document-gh-aw-guide

Conversation

@bradygaster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Comprehensive update to the GitHub Agentic Workflows guide addressing accuracy, completeness, and long-term maintainability.

Changes

Slash command reference — flat list replaced with four grouped tables (team management, research/planning, acceptance/activation, implementation) covering every supported variant, sourced from \workflows/squad.md.

Fast-path risks — per-path table of skipped stages; /squad plan\ skips triage + scope review; /squad plan accept\ creates GitHub issues immediately with no undo.

Implementation worker steps — full sequence documented (dep check → dup check → routing → implement → build/test/lint → self-review → one PR). Epic slot calculation and merge-relay auto-refill documented from workflow source.

/squad implement\ vs. GitHub Copilot coding agent — new comparison table; explicit statement that the worker does NOT enlist \copilot-swe-agent[bot].

Review lifecycle gap — new section: worker self-review steps, no /squad review\ command exists, open lifecycle gap named.

Troubleshooting fix — \create-issue\ max corrected 30 → 75 (verified in workflow frontmatter); remediation updated to idempotent re-run.

*Drift-proof \git add* — both explicit file lists replaced with \git add -- .gitattributes .github/aw/ .github/workflows/\ so the commit step stays correct as Squad ships new workflow files.

Validation

\
PASS: 84 fences balanced, 7 bash blocks, 40393 chars
\\

Docs-only change. No runtime code modified.

brady gaster and others added 2 commits August 14, 2026 15:23
…ement vs copilot agent, review lifecycle gap

- Replace single flat command table with grouped tables (team management,
  research/planning, acceptance/activation, implementation) covering all
  supported variants including /squad plan program revise and /squad research <focus>
- Expand fast-paths section: explicit table of skipped stages and per-path
  risk callouts for /squad plan and /squad plan accept
- Expand implementing issues: full worker step sequence (dep check, dup check,
  routing, build/test/lint, self-review, PR), epic slot calculation detail
- Add '/squad implement vs. GitHub Copilot coding agent' comparison table
  and clarification that /squad implement does not enlist copilot-swe-agent[bot]
- Add 'Review lifecycle and current gaps' section documenting worker self-review
  steps, no /squad review command exists, and the open lifecycle gap
- Fix troubleshooting: create-issue max corrected from 30 to 75; remediation
  updated to re-run (idempotent) rather than split cycles

Pre-existing dirty files NOT staged: samples/storage-provider-azure/scripts/{create,delete}-storage.sh

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…/ glob

Listing individual workflow files in the commit step drifts whenever Squad
ships new or renamed shared imports. Replace both occurrences (Quick start
and Setup sections) with:

  git add -- .gitattributes .github/aw/ .github/workflows/

This captures all workflow sources, lock files, and shared imports regardless
of how the shipped file set evolves.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 16, 2026 20:28
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 Impact Analysis — PR #1722

Risk tier: 🟢 LOW

📊 Summary

Metric Count
Files changed 1
Files added 0
Files modified 1
Files deleted 0
Modules touched 1

🎯 Risk Factors

  • 1 files changed (≤5 → LOW)
  • 1 module(s) touched (≤1 → LOW)

📦 Modules Affected

docs (1 file)
  • docs/src/content/docs/guide/gh-aw.md

This report is generated automatically for every PR. See #733 for details.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🛫 PR Readiness Check

ℹ️ This comment updates on each push. Last checked: commit 84ce063

PR Scope: 🔧 Infrastructure

⚠️ 3 item(s) to address before review

Status Check Details
❌ Single commit 2 commits — consider squashing before review
✅ Not in draft Ready for review
✅ Branch up to date Up to date with dev
❌ Copilot review No Copilot review yet — it may still be processing
✅ Changeset present No source files changed — changeset not required
✅ Scope clean No .squad/ or docs/proposals/ files
✅ No merge conflicts No merge conflicts
✅ Copilot threads resolved No Copilot review threads
❌ CI passing 1 check(s) still running

Files Changed (1 file, +184 −83)

File +/−
docs/src/content/docs/guide/gh-aw.md +184 −83

Total: +184 −83


This check runs automatically on every push. Fix any ❌ items and push again.
See CONTRIBUTING.md and PR Requirements for details.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) guide to better document Squad slash commands, fast-path tradeoffs, implementation-worker behavior, and the gap in automated review after implementation—aimed at improving accuracy and maintainability of the docs.

Changes:

  • Reworked /squad slash-command reference into grouped tables and expanded variants/notes.
  • Added guidance on fast-path risks (/squad plan, /squad plan accept) and clarified implementation-worker + epic slot behavior.
  • Added /squad implement vs @copilot comparison and documented the lack of a dedicated /squad review workflow/command.
Show a summary per file
File Description
docs/src/content/docs/guide/gh-aw.md Expanded and reorganized gh-aw/Squad guide content (commands, risks, worker behavior, troubleshooting)

Review details

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Suppressed comments (1)

docs/src/content/docs/guide/gh-aw.md:117

  • This git add snippet stages all of .github/aw/, which can include downloaded workflow logs under .github/aw/logs/. Since the log ignore file is discussed immediately after, it’s safer to call out (in the snippet) that .github/aw/logs/.gitignore should exist before staging to avoid accidentally committing logs.
git add -- .gitattributes .github/aw/ .github/workflows/
git commit -m "ci: add Squad agentic workflow"
git push
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 4
  • Review effort level: Lite

Comment on lines +38 to 40
git add -- .gitattributes .github/aw/ .github/workflows/
git commit -m "ci: add Squad agentic workflow"
git push
| Universe is full on cast-member | All character names in the universe are allocated | Retire an unused member first, or re-cast with `/squad cast` |
| "No plan found" on plan accept | No `/squad plan` comment exists yet | Run `/squad plan` first to generate a plan for review |
| Plan accept creates fewer issues than expected | `create-issue` safe-output has a max of 30 | Split into multiple plan/accept cycles for very large decompositions |
| Plan accept creates fewer issues than expected | `create-issue` safe-output has a max of 75 | Re-run the identical activation command — it is idempotent and picks up where it left off |
Comment on lines +183 to +184
| `/squad cast` | Analyze your repo and generate a tailored team of AI agents | Replaces existing team |
| `/squad cast [brief]` | Cast with an inline brief | Include your team spec in the same comment |
| `/squad connect <owner/repo>` | Link to an external squad source | Remote-managed; syncs at activation |
| `/squad adopt <owner/repo>` | Copy a squad from another repo | One-time copy; you own it after |
| `/squad cast-member <description>` | Add a single specialist to an existing team | Allocates a name from the existing universe |
| `/squad cast-member rename <name> to <new-focus>` | Change an existing member's specialty | Keeps identity; regenerates charter |
@bradygaster
bradygaster merged commit b0b4ac9 into dev Aug 16, 2026
16 checks passed
@bradygaster
bradygaster deleted the bradygaster-pao-document-gh-aw-guide branch August 20, 2026 07:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants