You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Define the cast-through-accept planning ontology and versioned artifact schemas #1649
Define a versioned, machine-readable contract for intent, research findings, triage dispositions, decisions, program plans, implementation plans, validation results, and acceptance state.
Requirements
Preserve provenance to the root intent and separate findings from accepted work.
Install bradygaster/squad/workflows/squad.md@47e04dc73663cba40b47f00dd8e2ac42c37f6419 with gh aw add and compile strictly.
Run the live issue-comment sequence through research, triage, program plan, implementation plan, validation, scope acceptance, implementation acceptance, and activation.
Inspect each safe-output comment body.
Expected
Each phase starts with the versioned HTML marker required by the pinned workflow (squad-research-v1, squad-triage-v1, squad-program-v1, squad-implementation-v1, squad-validation-v1, squad-scope-accepted-v1, squad-impl-accepted-v1, squad-activated-v1) and lifecycle summary comments carry squad-lifecycle-state.
Actual
None of those required markers appeared. Representative runs/comments:
Later phases succeeded only by heuristic recognition of headings/content. Repeated activation happened to remain idempotent, but the machine-readable contract was absent.
Impact
Cross-run artifact discovery, revision selection, invalidation, and downstream automation depend on model heuristics instead of a versioned schema. This weakens deterministic validation and makes acceptance/activation drift harder to detect.
Activity
bradygaster commentedon Aug 8, 2026
E2E evidence: required lifecycle markers are omitted
Tested SHA:
47e04dc73663cba40b47f00dd8e2ac42c37f6419Consumer: https://github.com/bradygaster/squad-planning-e2e
Root intent: https://github.com/bradygaster/squad-planning-e2e/issues/2
Prerequisites / reproduction
bradygaster/squad/workflows/squad.md@47e04dc73663cba40b47f00dd8e2ac42c37f6419withgh aw addand compile strictly.Expected
Each phase starts with the versioned HTML marker required by the pinned workflow (
squad-research-v1,squad-triage-v1,squad-program-v1,squad-implementation-v1,squad-validation-v1,squad-scope-accepted-v1,squad-impl-accepted-v1,squad-activated-v1) and lifecycle summary comments carrysquad-lifecycle-state.Actual
None of those required markers appeared. Representative runs/comments:
Later phases succeeded only by heuristic recognition of headings/content. Repeated activation happened to remain idempotent, but the machine-readable contract was absent.
Impact
Cross-run artifact discovery, revision selection, invalidation, and downstream automation depend on model heuristics instead of a versioned schema. This weakens deterministic validation and makes acceptance/activation drift harder to detect.
fix(gh-aw): enforce first-line marker requirement in all planning mod…
feat(gh-aw): define planning ontology and artifact schemas (#1649)
fix(gh-aw): enforce first-line marker requirement in all planning mod…
feat: Evolve Squad planning into executable SDLC lifecycle (github#1648…