Repository navigation
GitHub CodeQL extractor seems incompatible with hosted runner #17945
Description
Description of the issue
I just pushed a random commit to my codeql-action fork, and the https://github.com/check-spelling-sandbox/github-codeql-action/actions/runs/11748775946/workflow failed https://github.com/check-spelling-sandbox/github-codeql-action/actions/runs/11748775946/job/32733592636
Current runner version: '2.320.0'
Operating System
- Ubuntu
- 22.04.5
- LTS
Runner Image
- Image: ubuntu-22.04
- Version: 20241103.1.0
- Included Software: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/ubuntu22/20241103.1/images/ubuntu/Ubuntu2204-Readme.md
- CodeQL Action Bundle 2.19.2 Release preparation for version 2.19.2 #17808
- Image Release: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/releases/tag/ubuntu22%2F20241103.1
/opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/0.0.0-20241108/x64/codeql/swift/tools/linux64/extractor: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/0.0.0-20241108/x64/codeql/swift/tools/linux64/extractor)
/opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/0.0.0-20241108/x64/codeql/swift/tools/linux64/extractor: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.31' not found (required by /opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/0.0.0-20241108/x64/codeql/swift/tools/linux64/extractor)
/opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/0.0.0-20241108/x64/codeql/swift/tools/linux64/extractor: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.32' not found (required by /opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/0.0.0-20241108/x64/codeql/swift/tools/linux64/extractor)
Activity
jsoref commentedon Nov 8, 2024
A previous build succeeded: https://github.com/check-spelling-sandbox/github-codeql-action/actions/runs/11697919997/job/32577384551
It was using CodeQL Action Bundle 2.19.1
So this feels like a regression from the release...
jketema commentedon Nov 8, 2024
We no longer support Swift on Linux. github/codeql-action#2588 is probably relevant here.
jsoref commentedon Nov 10, 2024
If it isn't supported, the binaries should be removed instead of leaving things that will just crash when run. Slightly preferably would be something which just does the equivalent of:
jketema commentedon Nov 10, 2024
Thanks for the suggestion. We'll take this in consideration. Closing this as completed, as the situation seems to have been clarified.