Skip to content

Detect and honor all licenses #57

Description

@tfmorris

Project Gutenberg is not entirely public domain works. It also includes works which have been licensed to them for distribution and which are not necessarily redistributable.

It's probably too much work to go an get permission from all the authors, so the safest thing to do is just exclude them. An example which is not public domain is Zen and the Art of the Internet https://github.com/GITenberg/Zen-and-the-Art-of-the-Internet_34 (it actually is legal to redistribute it, including modified copies, but it needs to include the specified license which makes the PG license in the repo misleading)

Activity

  1. sethwoodworth commented on May 27, 2013

    @sethwoodworth
    Contributor

    This was one of the first test repos I uploaded, I have at least some code that should filter out books with copyright other than public domain. But I wrote it after I had uploaded this test repo AFAICT. The repo that you mention has been deleted.

  2. sethwoodworth commented on May 27, 2013

    @sethwoodworth
    Contributor

    The only books in the PG archives with copyright that I am interested in are 400 books that were released on a CD in the early 90s that claim copyright via sweat-of-brow digitization. I would like to get in touch with the copyright owner, and request they remove their copyright claim, but this is a low priority. Until then I'll leave them out of the repos.

  3. eshellman commented on Oct 7, 2015

    @eshellman
    Contributor

    The NYPL folks did a heroic survey of ALL the copyright statements in PG, which they have shared with us. There are a significant number of the non-PD books that can be cleared. There are some that can't. Amusingly, the largest number of non-PD "books" are text-to-speech versions of PD books; the copyright claims on these are bogus, but the quality of the text-to-speech is laughable today, and are not of interest as books.

  4. tfmorris commented on Oct 7, 2015

    @tfmorris
    ContributorAuthor

    @eshellman Is their survey in the repo somewhere?

  5. eshellman commented on Oct 7, 2015

    @eshellman
    Contributor

    I was checking if I had permission to share it, and it seems I do. Where should I put it? I'll give you access in a minute.

  6. tfmorris commented on Oct 7, 2015

    @tfmorris
    ContributorAuthor
  7. eshellman commented on Oct 7, 2015

    @eshellman
    Contributor

    ok. I will create a "no-distribution" list in this repo, and make sure the copyright statements line up with what's in metadata

  8. tfmorris commented on Oct 30, 2018

    @tfmorris
    ContributorAuthor

    The "launch" email suggests that 1363 books were omitted, so perhaps this has been addressed?

  9. eshellman commented on Oct 31, 2018

    @eshellman
    Contributor

    Most of the 1363 books are audio or data. The books that are not in the public domain or openly licensed are also included in this list. The books that are not public domain in Germany and are the subject of the lawsuit against PG are denoted with a rights_note, which is referenced in the read-me.

    I need to go back and double check whether the books that are not public domain but ARE openly licensed have been correctly handled. It's been so long...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions