Repository navigation
Default values for missing class methods #643
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I am working on localization of some scripts using new localization tools I am developing. Specifically, I would like to localize the transposition scripts as a pilot project for other scripts in the repo. But these scripts still work with JW Lua. I would like to find an elegant solution for skipping the new method calls in RGP Lua so that the scripts can continue to work with JW Lua.
Describe the solution you'd like
It occurred to me that mixin might be able to provide default implementations of missing methods. What I have in mind is that any method call could provide an optional additional parameter. If the additional parameter were present (non nil), the mixin library would check for the existence of the underlying RGP Lua method. If not found, it would return either return the default value passed in or (if the method is fluid) ignore the call entirely and simply return self. (If found it would call the method and behave as it does now.)
Describe alternatives you've considered
I suppose I could write one-off versions of the new methods that do the same thing. Or I could pepper the scripts with ugly if-statements.
Activity
ThistleSifter commentedon Jan 20, 2024
As far as mixin solutions go, I think there are two reasonable options here.
Write the methods
Self explanatory...
Wrapping function & wrapping method
Add a function to the mixin namespace, like the example below. This could be used for anything (eg if a new function is added to RGPLua along the lines of
each, etc)For DX/readability, a method can be added which proxies the function above. Eg
If you want it to be fluid, pass
selfas the fallback value.rpatters1 commentedon Jan 20, 2024
After I posted this, it occurred to me that it would be possible to rewrite the methods in Lua. It's not like the OSs provide a lot of support for automatic control sizing, but (especially macOS) provides at least some.
I like the fallback call idea. I'm not crazy about the double-underscores (aesthetically) for the proxy. Do you think simply all caps would sufficient future-proofing?
rpatters1 commentedon Feb 9, 2024
This was closed with #649.