Repository navigation
Add 'fork' to auto backend - #614
Merged
Merged
Conversation
florimondmanca
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2019
florimondmanca
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Indeed, omission on my side! Thanks!
Member
Author
|
No sweat! 😃 |
Member
Author
|
Incidentally, #612 actually means we won't end up needing fork or a background manager at all. |
Contributor
|
Is this actually causing errors? Curious about why we didn't catch this… Probably worth refactoring our test setup to test all possible backends - right now I believe we force |
Member
Author
|
Yes - causing a We'll probably want to test using |
Contributor
|
@tomchristie I'm taking a look at it. :-) |
Kludex
referenced
this pull request
in pydantic/httpx2
May 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Seems that we don't have coverage for this yet.