Skip to content

Update for pyarrow 17 #427

Open
Open

Description

@rauerhans

We need pyarrow 17 in one of our projects, because of other dependency constraints. However, we also need 3.3.0, because we are facing unstable database connections with this library's version < 3. So it'd be lovely to relax the dependency on Pyarrow < 17 to include the latest stable version of 17.

Activity

  1. arredond commented on Oct 4, 2024

    @arredond
    Contributor

    (copying over from the PR comments)

    I see the fix here is to move to pyarrow<18.0 as the upper bound. Would you consider not adding an upper bound at all? Upper bounds really make dependency management much, much harder for complex projects.

    Here's a nice discussion on the topic.

    Also, I see this has already been a problem for other users in the past: #389 , #390 , #55

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions