Skip to content

High increase in memory consumption & thread count when updated to the 1.9.0 version #52

Closed

Description

@ondrejfuhrer

Hello team,

We’re currently running version 1.7.0 of your SDK without any issues. We tried to upgrade to the newest version this week, however after deploying the version we could see immediately a high increase on opened threads & increased memory usage for each running pod. Here you can see the reported avg thread count for the deployed period (14:55 we started rolling out the version 1.9.0, at around 15:12 we started rolling out the previous version).
ScreenCapture at Wed Mar 23 15:30:53 CET 2022

At the same time memory consumption of each pod went approx. 50% up (I mean, needs to handle all the active threads etc), which leads me to an assumption that we might be facing some sort of resource leak in the library. Or is that something expected from your end? It’s hard to correlate any changelog items to this.

Also worth mentioning: We also tested other versions and it seems to have the same issues, so the issue was probably introduced in the version 1.8.0.

Activity

  1. ishaileshmishra commented on Mar 31, 2022

    @ishaileshmishra
    Contributor

    thanks for raising the issue, we are looking into it. @ondrejfuhrer

  2. ondrejfuhrer commented on May 10, 2022

    @ondrejfuhrer
    Author

    Hey @ishaileshmishra any update on this? It's more then a month without any update 😞

  3. ishaileshmishra commented on May 10, 2022

    @ishaileshmishra
    Contributor

    Hi @ondrejfuhrer, We have made some changes in the code that might be helpful for you. We are in the process to release a newer version of dependency by next week

  4. vitorsdcs commented on May 31, 2022

    @vitorsdcs

    Hi @ishaileshmishra, it looks like there is no new release yet. Can you provide us any updates on this? Thanks.

  5. added a commit that references this issue on Jun 1, 2022
  6. ishaileshmishra commented on Jun 3, 2022

    @ishaileshmishra
    Contributor

    Hi @vitorsdcs @ondrejfuhrer, Please update the SDK to v1.10.0 and let us know if it solved the issue.

  7. ondrejfuhrer commented on Jun 3, 2022

    @ondrejfuhrer
    Author

    Hey @ishaileshmishra , thank you for that. Created a different issue with 1.10.0 preventing us from actually trying it out. Can you please look at it? #57

  8. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Jun 16, 2022
  9. ondrejfuhrer commented on Jun 22, 2022

    @ondrejfuhrer
    Author

    Hey @ishaileshmishra , just wanted to let you know, that it seems all the issues we had with the latest release are fixed and looking great. Thank you for your support 🙂

  10. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Dec 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions