Skip to content

sudo in Dockerfile? #65

Closed
Closed

Description

@nhooyr

Activity

  1. incizzle commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @incizzle

    I agree with @sr229 the container should not be launching commands as sudo all the time.

  2. nhooyr commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @nhooyr
    ContributorAuthor

    @incizzle appreciate the input but could you elaborate on your reasoning why?

  3. incizzle commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @incizzle

    I think @sr229 summed it up pretty well. I personally don't see running every command as sudo in this environment as a bad thing, but it doesn't instill good security practices & habits when this is transferred to other places.

  4. sr229 commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @sr229
    Contributor

    This is how I see we're teaching people bad practices. They don't know linux, and they're learning via guides. If they decide to use Linux outside of Coder they won't know the concept behind sudo and permissions. We need to let them know "hey, you might need to run this specific command first before doing that", and this adds a certain familiarity of how the concept of permissions work.

    We in turn, teach them how security usually works in Linux for beginners, and we give a sense of familiarity for other users. You don't see GCP giving you away a VM with a root account because you're expected to know about sudo and the concept of Linux security by permissions.

  5. frol commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @frol

    Docker best-practices (“USER” section) describes how to do this.

    As a side effect, running code-server as root will result in that the newly created files become owned by root, so soon enough user will end up with a project that cannot be modified from their regular user. To solve the permission issues, it is recommended to create a regular user and remap host UID & GID

  6. sr229 commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @sr229
    Contributor

    I'm willing to reimplement the Dockerfile in the repo by basing off from my already existing image, should I get enough consensus that we should do usermode in this Dockerfile.

  7. NGTmeaty commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @NGTmeaty
    Contributor

    I think this ^^ is the best idea at the moment. May want to wait for a code owner to give their opinions.

  8. sr229 commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @sr229
    Contributor

    @PhilsLab I don't think it should be as locked down as you need to on #86. However, I did provide a variant that does exactly that which works for OpenShift Online, but its pain to compensate for common use cases.

  9. incizzle commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @incizzle

    @PhilsLab, In order to have a separate container for each dev environment, it would require a lot of recoding of the actual VS code online program. It sounds likes its gonna be very hard to implement but it is a cool idea.

  10. sr229 commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @sr229
    Contributor

    Theia did support this kind of work (Remember Eclipse Che 7?), however, this would require substantial backend re-engineering which would increase the amount of difficulty per new VSCode release since it might not be interopable with each other

  11. kylecarbs commented on Mar 7, 2019

    @kylecarbs
    Member

    You could just mount the projects and data-dir into your docker container on each start. Then you start where you were in a completely new environment.

  12. sr229 commented on Mar 11, 2019

    @sr229
    Contributor

    Implementing it as per #183.

  13. nhooyr commented on Mar 11, 2019

    @nhooyr
    ContributorAuthor

    https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/#user

    Avoid installing or using sudo as it has unpredictable TTY and signal-forwarding behavior that can cause problems. If you absolutely need functionality similar to sudo, such as initializing the daemon as root but running it as non-root), consider using “gosu”.

    This is interesting, though I'm not sure if its applicable to us or whether the advice is about RUN commands or the entrypoint.

    @frol

    As a side effect, running code-server as root will result in that the newly created files become owned by root, so soon enough user will end up with a project that cannot be modified from their regular user. To solve the permission issues, it is recommended to create a regular user and remap host UID & GID

    This is definitely a big issue. I think this alone is enough to justify the use of a user account. We definitely do not want all files written as root but instead whatever user the dev is using.

  14. nhooyr commented on Mar 11, 2019

    @nhooyr
    ContributorAuthor

    Btw guys, container per terminal is being tracked at #190

  15. sr229 commented on Mar 11, 2019

    @sr229
    Contributor

    @nhooyr From what I have done with user-mode containers, this might increase the image size, but I might be wrong.

  16. nhooyr commented on Mar 11, 2019

    @nhooyr
    ContributorAuthor

    @nhooyr From what I have done with user-mode containers, this might increase the image size, but I might be wrong.

    Thats fine. Though, as I mentioned earlier, this issue has not yet been discussed by the team and we're not sure of its direction. Please keep in mind your changes may not be accepted.

    Also, since we're using ENTRYPOINT we can omit the CMD stage IMHO. We should be fixing this in the program-side.

    Already fixed. See #188

  17. avelino commented on Mar 11, 2019

    @avelino
    Contributor

    Do not like to run with root even inside the container, I think it important to have a user (ex: coder)
    WIP in PR #192 by @sr229 (good job)

  18. krazyito65 commented on Mar 11, 2019

    @krazyito65

    As an FYI: from what I've seen CentOS / Fedora based systems require Docker to be run as root.

    https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/08/why-we-dont-let-non-root-users-run-docker-in-centos-fedora-or-rhel/ -- is a good read

  19. nhooyr commented on Mar 11, 2019

    @nhooyr
    ContributorAuthor

    That is interesting but I believe orthogonal to our discussion. We're discussing whether the processes inside the container should run as root.

  20. krazyito65 commented on Mar 11, 2019

    @krazyito65

    My bad, misunderstood.

  21. added 5 commits that reference this issue on Apr 4, 2019
    85b273f
    b24621f
    54cf52c
    cae2b3f
    ebac848
  22. added a commit that references this issue on Jun 19, 2019
    be709d4
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions