You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Design: converge call_sites[]/accessed_symbols[]/local_variables[] with the body{} projection (TS parity) #120
Cross-analyzer divergence found comparing v2 wire formats: codeanalyzer-typescript consumes its internal call-site/local-variable facts to build body{}call nodes and then drops the lists from the wire (emit.ts v1-only field strip); codeanalyzer-python emits both — the body{} projection and the per-callable call_sites[] / accessed_symbols[] / local_variables[] lists — a redundant double representation of the same facts.
Why python still has them: the lists predate the v2 body projection and carry detail the body call nodes don't — structured arguments (ast_kind/inferred_type), receiver_expr/receiver_type, is_constructor_call — and the python-sdk actively reconstructs all three (PyNeo4jBackend rebuilds call_sites/local_variables rows for local ↔ Neo4j parity; reconstruct.accessed_symbols rebuilds from accessed_symbols_json).
Converging requires a keystone decision, not an analyzer-local edit:
where the per-callsite argument/receiver detail lives once the list is gone (enriched call body nodes?);
whether accessed_symbols/local_variables become body-linked facts, graph-only rows, or are dropped;
matching SDK model + both-backend changes and golden regeneration;
whether TS should instead add the detail python has (the lists may be the richer format worth keeping).
This is schema v2 evolution spanning codeanalyzer-python, codeanalyzer-typescript, and python-sdk → enters via designing-cldk-changes with a spec + epic; parked here until that rung picks it up.
Activity
feat(neo4j)!: collapse :PyCallSite onto the body node (#120)
fix(schema): strip call_sites at emit, not with a field exclude (#120)
Merge pull request #138 from codellm-devkit/fix/issue-120-call-site-b…
fix(schema): pydantic v1 compatibility for the 3.10 dependency line