Skip to content

docs: describe RDFDiff's predicate-membership checks accurately - #5

Open
forest-savage1234 wants to merge 3 commits into
casework:masterfrom
forest-savage1234:leftover-c10
Open

forest-savage1234 wants to merge 3 commits into
casework:masterfrom
forest-savage1234:leftover-c10

Conversation

@forest-savage1234

@forest-savage1234 forest-savage1234 commented Aug 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain that --verify checks predicates collected from the input graph against the glossary's subject, predicate and object lists. Replace broader claims about validating every input entry and clarify that these checks do not establish SHACL or CASE/UCO conformance. Remove the unsupported abandonment label and time-sensitive release claim.

Validation: inspected the actual list-building and verify_object_existance paths and their CLI dispatch at this revision. No Python 2 execution or ontology-conformance run is claimed. Runtime code is unchanged.

forest-savage1234 and others added 3 commits August 24, 2026 03:32
Signed-off-by: Forest Savage <forestsavage03@gmail.com>
Explain that `--verify` compares input predicates against the glossary's subject, predicate and object lists, after excluding triples containing blank nodes. Replace broader claims about validating every input entry and clarify that these checks do not establish SHACL or CASE/UCO conformance. Remove the unsupported abandonment label and time-sensitive release claim.

Validation: inspected the actual list-building and `verify_object_existance` paths and their CLI dispatch at this revision. No Python 2 execution or ontology-conformance run is claimed. Runtime code is unchanged.
Remove the unsupported claim that every blank-node triple is excluded.
Describe the collected-predicate membership check shown by the current source.
Documentation only; runtime code and tests are unchanged.
@forest-savage1234 forest-savage1234 changed the title README pin: this repo does not target CASE 1.5.0 docs: describe RDFDiff's predicate-membership checks accurately Sep 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant