Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.

How Enterprise? #270

Open
Open

Description

@BinaryMuse

At minimum we'll need to wait till the GraphQL API is available there, but we're also constantly adding fields to GitHub.com's codebase to account for our API use case — so how can we reliably support Enterprise sooner rather than later?

Activity

  1. ThirdEyeRose commented on Jan 11, 2017

    @ThirdEyeRose

    "How Enterprise?" indeed.

    By which I mean, can I use this on GHE.io? I tried pulling/pushing and ⚛️ just looked at me grumpily.

  2. BinaryMuse commented on Jan 12, 2017

    @BinaryMuse
    ContributorAuthor

    @that-pat Hm, interesting — this issue was actually referring to the GitHub integration portion of the package. The Git integration is not GitHub specific, so it should just work. Did you get any sort of error or anything?

  3. smashwilson commented on Jan 12, 2017

    @smashwilson
    Contributor

    @that-pat In particular, can you open the dev console (cmd-option-i) and then try to push and pull? You'll likely see git error messages, including stderr and such, which would be super helpful.

  4. ThirdEyeRose commented on Jan 12, 2017

    @ThirdEyeRose

    Absolutely. Here's the error that I get through the Atom interface:
    screen shot 2017-01-12 at 8 15 27 am

    And here are the only errors in the dev console:
    screen shot 2017-01-12 at 8 17 26 am

    When I do a fetch instead of a push or pull, it asks me for a username and a password and then does nothing.

    These operations do work with the Git Plus Atom plugin which I had disabled for my initial tests and then re-enabled and tried again with the same results.

  5. chickenkiller commented on Jun 6, 2017

    @chickenkiller

    For information, GitHub Enterprise 2.10.0 has just been released, with support for GraphQL API.

    Usage of GraphQL API through GitHub Enterprise is documented here.

  6. BinaryMuse commented on Jun 12, 2017

    @BinaryMuse
    ContributorAuthor

    While this release of Enterprise supports GraphQL, the GitHub integration part of this package is still in progress and we're still adding fields to GitHub.com's GraphQL API as we need them, and these new fields will take some amount of time to make it to an Enterprise release.

    In an ideal world, we could do some sort of feature detection and use different "versions" of the integration depending on which versions of the GraphQL API are available, but this is something we haven't yet talked about so I don't have any immediate plans to share. It is on my mind, however!

  7. quasipedia commented on Nov 3, 2017

    @quasipedia
  8. dotku commented on Apr 18, 2018

    @dotku
  9. ungarida commented on Jun 17, 2018

    @ungarida
  10. tsal commented on Jul 3, 2018

    @tsal
  11. jjnich commented on Oct 10, 2018

    @jjnich
  12. sidx64 commented on Nov 20, 2018

    @sidx64
  13. quasipedia commented on Dec 12, 2018

    @quasipedia
  14. lee-dohm commented on Dec 12, 2018

    @lee-dohm
    Contributor

    @quasipedia You can use emoji reactions on the original post to upvote it if you want to let us know that this is something that is important to you. The reason why we minimize these comments as off-topic or spam is because they do nothing to move the issue toward completion. When an issue bubbles to the top and we go to look for people giving us helpful information such as debug logs, steps to reproduce the problem, or other helpful information, having to scroll through bunches of "is this done yet?" makes our job take longer. If you would like to give direct input to the team on your thoughts about prioritization, you can email us at atom@github.com.

  15. sri321 commented on Feb 15, 2019

    @sri321
  16. mstaragrieb commented on Dec 9, 2020

    @mstaragrieb

    I wonder if this is still really open? Trying to find a solution for using GitHub Enterprise with Atom.

  17. iamh2o commented on Nov 19, 2021

    @iamh2o

    I spent a few days looking for what I was doing wrong b/c I was unable to get github enterprise linked to ATOM, it never crossed my mind that it was not possible...... This is a huge ding vs Atom. Most of my work, is done for a company where everything is via GH enterprise. I guess I'll add my +1, but considering how long this has been open, I see a different editor happening sooner.

    A bit of advice- I encourage you to call out in the docs that you do not, infact, support GH enterprise and save a whole lot of people wasted time.

  18. Leebre commented on Apr 12, 2022

    @Leebre

    +1 to integration with Github enterprise! I like Atom a lot and integration with GH enterprise would be a great feature. I also agree it would be good to advertise more clearly that the integration isn't available in the meantime.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions