You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.
At minimum we'll need to wait till the GraphQL API is available there, but we're also constantly adding fields to GitHub.com's codebase to account for our API use case — so how can we reliably support Enterprise sooner rather than later?
Reacted by Caleb Meyer, Peter Carnesciali, Lionel Orry, Rodrigo Neumann, Anders D. Johnson, Tamal White, Brian Campuzano, Jason Antman, Ryan Walsh, Jon Middleton and 72 more
Reacted by KC and (major) john (major)
Reacted by Caleb Meyer, Lionel Orry, Rodrigo Neumann, Ryuichi Okumura, Christian Wolf, stevschm, Sam Fairbanks, Mike Starov, Adrián Seijo, Dmitry Sychev and 3 more
Reacted by jjnich, Adrián Seijo, rahul_winner, Dmitry Sychev, Andreas Agerblad, Paul Kassebaum, ESB, jobo and (major) john (major)
@that-pat Hm, interesting — this issue was actually referring to the GitHub integration portion of the package. The Git integration is not GitHub specific, so it should just work. Did you get any sort of error or anything?
@that-pat In particular, can you open the dev console (cmd-option-i) and then try to push and pull? You'll likely see git error messages, including stderr and such, which would be super helpful.
Absolutely. Here's the error that I get through the Atom interface:
And here are the only errors in the dev console:
When I do a fetch instead of a push or pull, it asks me for a username and a password and then does nothing.
These operations do work with the Git Plus Atom plugin which I had disabled for my initial tests and then re-enabled and tried again with the same results.
While this release of Enterprise supports GraphQL, the GitHub integration part of this package is still in progress and we're still adding fields to GitHub.com's GraphQL API as we need them, and these new fields will take some amount of time to make it to an Enterprise release.
In an ideal world, we could do some sort of feature detection and use different "versions" of the integration depending on which versions of the GraphQL API are available, but this is something we haven't yet talked about so I don't have any immediate plans to share. It is on my mind, however!
Reacted by Alexander Sennikov, John Cole, Brian Campuzano, Michael K, Julien Marandet, Aaron Wolf, SBTestuserCH, Mike McBride, Mike Starov, rahul_winner and 3 more
@quasipedia You can use emoji reactions on the original post to upvote it if you want to let us know that this is something that is important to you. The reason why we minimize these comments as off-topic or spam is because they do nothing to move the issue toward completion. When an issue bubbles to the top and we go to look for people giving us helpful information such as debug logs, steps to reproduce the problem, or other helpful information, having to scroll through bunches of "is this done yet?" makes our job take longer. If you would like to give direct input to the team on your thoughts about prioritization, you can email us at atom@github.com.
Reacted by KC
Reacted by Michael K, Jordan Fineberg, Greg, Philipp Bormann, Scott Cranfill and Kunal
I spent a few days looking for what I was doing wrong b/c I was unable to get github enterprise linked to ATOM, it never crossed my mind that it was not possible...... This is a huge ding vs Atom. Most of my work, is done for a company where everything is via GH enterprise. I guess I'll add my +1, but considering how long this has been open, I see a different editor happening sooner.
A bit of advice- I encourage you to call out in the docs that you do not, infact, support GH enterprise and save a whole lot of people wasted time.
+1 to integration with Github enterprise! I like Atom a lot and integration with GH enterprise would be a great feature. I also agree it would be good to advertise more clearly that the integration isn't available in the meantime.
Activity
ThirdEyeRose commentedon Jan 11, 2017
"How Enterprise?" indeed.
By which I mean, can I use this on GHE.io? I tried pulling/pushing and ⚛️ just looked at me grumpily.
BinaryMuse commentedon Jan 12, 2017
@that-pat Hm, interesting — this issue was actually referring to the GitHub integration portion of the package. The Git integration is not GitHub specific, so it should just work. Did you get any sort of error or anything?
smashwilson commentedon Jan 12, 2017
@that-pat In particular, can you open the dev console (cmd-option-i) and then try to push and pull? You'll likely see git error messages, including stderr and such, which would be super helpful.
ThirdEyeRose commentedon Jan 12, 2017
Absolutely. Here's the error that I get through the Atom interface:

And here are the only errors in the dev console:

When I do a fetch instead of a push or pull, it asks me for a username and a password and then does nothing.
These operations do work with the Git Plus Atom plugin which I had disabled for my initial tests and then re-enabled and tried again with the same results.
chickenkiller commentedon Jun 6, 2017
For information, GitHub Enterprise 2.10.0 has just been released, with support for GraphQL API.
Usage of GraphQL API through GitHub Enterprise is documented here.
BinaryMuse commentedon Jun 12, 2017
While this release of Enterprise supports GraphQL, the GitHub integration part of this package is still in progress and we're still adding fields to GitHub.com's GraphQL API as we need them, and these new fields will take some amount of time to make it to an Enterprise release.
In an ideal world, we could do some sort of feature detection and use different "versions" of the integration depending on which versions of the GraphQL API are available, but this is something we haven't yet talked about so I don't have any immediate plans to share. It is on my mind, however!
quasipedia commentedon Nov 3, 2017
dotku commentedon Apr 18, 2018
ungarida commentedon Jun 17, 2018
tsal commentedon Jul 3, 2018
jjnich commentedon Oct 10, 2018
sidx64 commentedon Nov 20, 2018
quasipedia commentedon Dec 12, 2018
lee-dohm commentedon Dec 12, 2018
@quasipedia You can use emoji reactions on the original post to upvote it if you want to let us know that this is something that is important to you. The reason why we minimize these comments as off-topic or spam is because they do nothing to move the issue toward completion. When an issue bubbles to the top and we go to look for people giving us helpful information such as debug logs, steps to reproduce the problem, or other helpful information, having to scroll through bunches of "is this done yet?" makes our job take longer. If you would like to give direct input to the team on your thoughts about prioritization, you can email us at atom@github.com.
sri321 commentedon Feb 15, 2019
mstaragrieb commentedon Dec 9, 2020
I wonder if this is still really open? Trying to find a solution for using GitHub Enterprise with Atom.
iamh2o commentedon Nov 19, 2021
I spent a few days looking for what I was doing wrong b/c I was unable to get github enterprise linked to ATOM, it never crossed my mind that it was not possible...... This is a huge ding vs Atom. Most of my work, is done for a company where everything is via GH enterprise. I guess I'll add my +1, but considering how long this has been open, I see a different editor happening sooner.
A bit of advice- I encourage you to call out in the docs that you do not, infact, support GH enterprise and save a whole lot of people wasted time.
Leebre commentedon Apr 12, 2022
+1 to integration with Github enterprise! I like Atom a lot and integration with GH enterprise would be a great feature. I also agree it would be good to advertise more clearly that the integration isn't available in the meantime.