Repository navigation
ADFA-365 - Permission Screen Test - #11
Merged
Merged
Conversation
YahorZCzygunki
changed the title
romanlapa
reviewed
Feb 28, 2025
jatezzz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2026
ADFA-365 - Permission Screen Test
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
fryanpan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2026
…on to abandon ApkInstallationViewModel.destroy returned as soon as reloadStatus reported no live session, before reaching unregisterSessionCallback. That is the common exit: the install has finished, so the session is gone, but the callback installApk registered is still held by the process-wide PackageInstaller and keeps firing into a view model that no longer exists. The unregister now runs first, on its own, and the session lookup and abandon follow as before. Mutation proof: with the old ordering the new test fails `Verification failed: call 1 of 1: PackageInstaller(#11).unregisterSessionCallback(any())) was not called`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xc9hCQm29w7tLSUVnKbCjd
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allow tests to be executable in one scope