You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
The PR #12667 effectively generates tests to catch the bug. However, since it uses ThreadRng to generate data, the results are non-reproducible, making it difficult to pinpoint the root cause of the failure
Describe the solution you'd like
I want the test to generate data randomly each time, but also have the option to pass a seed, so that failing test cases can be made reproducible
@Rachelint are you still planning to work on this? If not, I'd like to pick it up. My plan is to pass a seed through the aggregation fuzzer and print it when a run fails, so the failure can be replayed.
Activity
Rachelint commentedon Oct 13, 2024
Yes, it is the one of the most important features should be supported for me, too.
I am working on it.
Rachelint commentedon Oct 13, 2024
take
stantheman0128 commentedon Oct 13, 2026
take
stantheman0128 commentedon Oct 13, 2026
@Rachelint are you still planning to work on this? If not, I'd like to pick it up. My plan is to pass a seed through the aggregation fuzzer and print it when a run fails, so the failure can be replayed.