You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 25, 2024. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 25, 2024. It is now read-only.
Hi. Just wanted to let you know I decided to upload httpsig into Debian. The source of the uploaded package is available from <URL: https://salsa.debian.org/pere/python-httpsig >. The debian/patches/ directory contain the changes I needed to apply to get it building and working in Debian.
Is there anything I should know about this package related to packaging? Will its API be stable for the next 2-3 years, or should I keep it out of the stable Debian release?
It is, somewhat. I'm no longer actively using it, but I check in on it now and again.
The API should be stable (both an intentional decision and as a result of the above). If there are changes you need to make for Debian I'd appreciate a PR (if applicable to the general population) so that there's only one version out there.
I am worried about shipping a library implementing a obsolete draft of the specification might be doing its users a dis-service, and might pull it from the next stable release if nothing change there. For the project I considered using httpsig, I ended up using jwt instead to make sure the specification was not a moving target, so for me it is less of a priority than it used to be.
Activity
petterreinholdtsen commentedon Jul 6, 2018
The package just entered Debian.
petterreinholdtsen commentedon Sep 17, 2018
Is the httpsig project still being maintained? The lack of feedback to issues make me worried.
ahknight commentedon Nov 27, 2018
It is, somewhat. I'm no longer actively using it, but I check in on it now and again.
The API should be stable (both an intentional decision and as a result of the above). If there are changes you need to make for Debian I'd appreciate a PR (if applicable to the general population) so that there's only one version out there.
petterreinholdtsen commentedon Nov 27, 2018
Right. I'll do my best.
I am worried about shipping a library implementing a obsolete draft of the specification might be doing its users a dis-service, and might pull it from the next stable release if nothing change there. For the project I considered using httpsig, I ended up using jwt instead to make sure the specification was not a moving target, so for me it is less of a priority than it used to be.
petterreinholdtsen commentedon Jan 15, 2023
Hi. Any plans to make a new release of python-httpsig?