Skip to content

Add Server 2016 NAT support聽#44

Open

Description

@iainbrighton

With Server 2016 TP3+, there is a new NAT virtual switch type. This would be an excellent addition to the module (I wish it was included in Windows 10 too 馃槧). However, in the first instance, it will need some additional metadata in the configuration document..

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Add Serv 2016 NAT support[/-] [+]Add Server 2016 NAT support[/+] on Jan 3, 2016
  2. DexterPOSH commented on Jan 4, 2016

    @DexterPOSH
    Contributor

    @iainbrighton I can work on adding this NAT support.
    I have a Server 2016 box , where I am already playing with the Module.

  3. iainbrighton commented on Jan 4, 2016

    @iainbrighton
    ContributorAuthor

    @DexterPOSH - Thanks for volunteering! 馃槂

    Just a word of warning - as we're using the xVMSwitch from the xHyper-V DSC resources to configure the virtual switches, this functionality will first need to be put into the official https://github.com/PowerShell/xHyper-V resource. I have opened an issue dsccommunity/HyperVDsc#40 to implement this functionality.

    Are you still happy to implement this functionality over there first? Once complete, we can then enable NAT functionality here?

  4. DexterPOSH commented on Jan 4, 2016

    @DexterPOSH
    Contributor

    @iainbrighton Thanks for the heads up.
    Let me try and see if I can finish this early, if am able to do that I will do a PR to the parent repo.

  5. iainbrighton commented on Jan 6, 2016

    @iainbrighton
    ContributorAuthor

    @DexterPOSH @csandfeld - FYI - It looks like NAT support is included on Win 10 build 10586. I might be seeing the NAT -SwitchType be because I have the RSAT tools installed?! Regardless, I have a NAT virtual switch up and running on build 10586 馃槂

    From other Twitter conversations, it looks like the New-VMSwitch implementation might be changing, at least that it what it looks like in the later Win 10 build 11082. If this is the case, we're all going to be in for a bumpy ride 馃槵

  6. csandfeld commented on Jan 6, 2016

    @csandfeld
    Contributor

    NAT support on Win 10 馃憤
    Changing New-VMSwitch implementation 馃憥

  7. kilasuit commented on Jan 6, 2016

    @kilasuit
    Contributor

    Win 10 11082 allows me to specify NAT as the Switch type although it seems that the Help Needs updating to reflect that this has been included - not updated either after running Update-Help -Force

    I reckon its part of either the implemented version of HyperV or possibly via RSAT tools

    But you can create a NAT Switch with the below

    New-VMSwitch -Name NAT -SwitchType NAT -NATSubnetAddress 1.1.1.1

    Poor example but yeah its in there

  8. iainbrighton commented on Jan 6, 2016

    @iainbrighton
    ContributorAuthor
  9. kilasuit commented on Jan 7, 2016

    @kilasuit
    Contributor

    Didnt have it installed when I ran it - though I do now and it installed fine using my Install-Win10RSATTools function https://github.com/kilasuit/PoshFunctions/blob/Dev/Scripts/Install-Win10RSATTools.ps1

  10. DexterPOSH commented on Jan 7, 2016

    @DexterPOSH
    Contributor

    @iainbrighton I spoke to Ravikanth at work and he already has a NAT VM switch implementation in his repo. He will be doing a PR soon to the xHyperV repo.

    I will be going through that and see how we can fit those changes here.

  11. iainbrighton commented on Jan 8, 2016

    @iainbrighton
    ContributorAuthor

    @DexterPOSH Excellent! This is what I have run on my Win10 machine:

    ## Create NAT virtual switch
    ## This automatically adds the 172.16.3.1/24 IP address to the virtual ethernet adapter
    ## Removing the virtual switch doesn't appear to clean this up particularly well :(
    New-VMSwitch -Name NAT -SwitchType NAT -NATSubnetAddress 172.16.3.0/24
    ## Add the NAT translation for machines on the 172.16.3.0/24 subnet
    New-NetNat -Name NAT -InternalIPInterfaceAddressPrefix 172.16.3.0/24

    I think we're going to need a NAT translation DSC resource. What repo this goes into, I haven't a clue at the moment! It may need a new 'xNAT' repo or put into the xNetworking repo?

  12. DexterPOSH commented on Jan 8, 2016

    @DexterPOSH
    Contributor
  13. iainbrighton commented on Jan 11, 2016

    @iainbrighton
    ContributorAuthor

    @DexterPOSH I don't see any reference to a New-NetNat equivalent resource? I'm sure this will need working as well?

  14. DexterPOSH commented on Jan 12, 2016

    @DexterPOSH
    Contributor

    @iainbrighton, I do see New-NetNat being used in the Set-TargetResource definition in the psm1 file.

  15. iainbrighton commented on Jan 12, 2016

    @iainbrighton
    ContributorAuthor

    @DexterPOSH I'm not 100% convinced that that's the right place for it. What happens when I need an alternative NAT configuration?

    IMHO the resource shouldn't be making any assumptions, but that's probably a conversation that needs to happen over at dsccommunity/HyperVDsc#40

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions