Repository navigation
🧪 Add concurrent test for ScriptMutex::unlock - #277
Tcode-Motion wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
🎯 What: Added a concurrent test for the previously untested public function
ScriptMutex::unlockinstdlib/src/sync.rs.📊 Coverage: Covered the thread synchronization scenario, ensuring that calling
unlockfrom one thread correctly notifies other threads blocked onlock.✨ Result: Increased test coverage by validating the inter-thread wakeup mechanism of
ScriptMutex.PR created automatically by Jules for task 1439372915663548326 started by @Tcode-Motion