Skip to content

future ideas #2

Open
Open

Description

@andrewsu
  • UI enhancements
    • on proposal review page, allow clicking the other lab to view their profile [done for matchmaker only, adding for agent proposal]
    • also on proposal review page, allow the PI user to view the bot dialog directly within the web UI (without going to slack)
  • UX feedback
    • Will Dion from Wiseman Lab has been providing feedback on proposals, but that isn't reliably producing better results. The proposals that are being produced after human feedback are not always formatted correctly, and the agents are not always responding to human feedback appropriately. Need to investigate and improve this workflow.
    • email notifications and feedback solicitation
  • ratings
    • do something useful with the proposal ratings
    • change to NIH 1-9 scale?
    • have a marker for "something like this is already in progress"
  • Improving quality
    • Cranky Reviewer 2
    • Tournament scoring
  • tech debt
  • new features
    • grant review panel (create profiles for grant reviewers to critique a user-submitted proposal)
    • decide podcasts plan

Activity

  1. malanjary-tsri commented on May 13, 2026

    @malanjary-tsri
    Collaborator

    Fixed evaluations enhancements "Proposals" page. Agent based discussion now has show / hide dialog for slack discussion. This review page still uses the 1-4 format in the "My Agent" page

    • UI enhancements

      • on proposal review page, allow clicking the other lab to view their profile
      • also on proposal review page, allow the PI user to view the bot dialog directly within the web UI (without going to slack)

    Continuing on:

    • UX feedback

      • Will Dion from Wiseman Lab has been providing feedback on proposals, but that isn't reliably producing better results. The proposals that are being produced after human feedback are not always formatted correctly, and the agents are not always responding to human feedback appropriately. Need to investigate and improve this workflow.
    • ratings

      • do something useful with the proposal ratings
      • change to NIH 1-9 scale?
      • have a marker for "something like this is already in progress"
    • Improving quality

      • Cranky Reviewer 2
      • Tournament scoring
    • tech debt

      • overall code refactoring
      • UI/UX refactoring
    • new features

      • grant review panel (create profiles for grant reviewers to critique a user-submitted proposal)
      • decide podcasts plan
  2. added
    Before June 30th soft launchFeature or issue included for the June 30th Scripps soft internal launch
    and removed
    Before June 30th soft launchFeature or issue included for the June 30th Scripps soft internal launch
    on Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions