Skip to content

docs: compare rules_pythonic with the other Python rulesets - #11

Draft
rigelk wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/ruleset-comparison
Draft

rigelk wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/ruleset-comparison

Conversation

@rigelk

@rigelk rigelk commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds a comparison table to the README: rules_python, aspect_rules_py 1.x and 2.0 //uv, rules_pycross, rules_uv and rules_pythonic, along lock input, where deps are declared, install mechanism, run-time layout, sdists, cross-builds and remote execution. Closes with where rules_pythonic sits and when to pick something else.

Versions are as of October 2026 and will need bumping when rules_py 2.0 leaves alpha.

@rigelk
rigelk marked this pull request as draft October 24, 2026 12:07
Adds a table in the README covering rules_python, aspect_rules_py 1.x and
2.0 //uv, rules_pycross, rules_uv and rules_pythonic along lock input,
where deps are declared, install mechanism, run-time layout, sdists,
cross-builds and remote execution, with a short note on where
rules_pythonic sits and when to pick something else.
@rigelk
rigelk force-pushed the docs/ruleset-comparison branch from 2f8b7d2 to fe8374d Compare October 24, 2026 12:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant