You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After comparing IPYNB and HTML files for all programming lectures, I noticed an important issue in the tags or numbering in math expressions of jupyter notebooks:
the numbering or tags for math expressions or equations in IPYNB files is different from those in HTML files,
when we cited those equations in both versions, the citation formats are the same.
For example, let's consider the lecture python_oop and look at the same equation, equation (1) in the ipynb (you need to view it in Anaconda or VS code)and equation (7.1) in the HTML:
In the following contexts of that equation, we cited the equation 3 times but using the tag/numbering the same as that in our website/HTML file (i.e., (7.1)).
You can also see this issue clearly from the following screenshot, where I labelled the equation tags with red lines.
thanks @shlff -- this is driven by the sphinx-tojupyter using tags in the equation environment. It is interesting the body text has the correct equation numbering but the equation itself has an incorrect tag. Nice pickup!
Activity
mmcky commentedon Dec 7, 2020
thanks @shlff -- this is driven by the
sphinx-tojupyterusingtagsin the equation environment. It is interesting the body text has the correct equation numbering but the equation itself has an incorrect tag. Nice pickup!mmcky commentedon Jul 7, 2021
This will be fixed in
sphinx-tojupyter==0.1.2mmcky commentedon Jul 7, 2021
thanks @shlff this is now fixed by #155