Is cd/Official/ or <CDStatus> authoritative? scscp1 and scscp2 disagree #45

Summary

Two of the 38 files in cd/Official/ declare themselves experimental:

The other 36 declare official.

Why it matters

A consumer deciding which dictionaries to trust has two signals that disagree,
and no way to tell which one you consider authoritative. Treating the directory
name as the answer — which it rather invites — silently pulls in experimental
content; treating <CDStatus> as the answer means the directory layout is
misleading.

I hit this harvesting the directory as "the official set" for a conformance
suite, and only noticed because the three malformed examples I reported in #44
turned out to be in one of these two files, which changed how seriously I took
them.

Possible resolutions

• if the directory is normative: move scscp1.ocd and scscp2.ocd to
  cd/experimental/;
• if <CDStatus> is normative: a line in the README saying so would save the
  next person the same question.

Also worth noting that both carry a CDReviewDate of 2017-12-31, which by the
standard's own convention marks them as due for review.

I have no stake in which way it goes — I would just like to be able to tell.

Disclosure: this report was drafted with AI assistance. The findings are not
generated text — they come from running an independent OpenMath 2.0
implementation locally over a clone of this repository. The file count, the two
<CDStatus> values and the review dates were read from the files by that run and
re-checked before posting, so they can be reproduced rather than taken on trust.