You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
From form: Fix Age-Depth Plot - calendar vs. radiocarbon yrs #4
The age-depth plot in Neotoma Explorer sometimes shows a mismatch between the age controls (dots) and age models (red line). This is usually because the dates are in radiocarbon years and the age model is in calendar years. We should always be plotting age controls and age models on the same temporal scale.
_This issue was autogenerated by the Google Form for Features_A notification has been sent to @SimonGoring.
The issue arises from how radiocarbon chron controls are stored in Neotoma. Neotoma allows Chron Controls to be stored as a) radiocarbon dates or as b) calibrated radiocarbon dates. The Chronology age-depth plotter is pulling these dates as is, which for a) will cause visual misalignment with the calibrated-year age-depth redline. A good example is Lake Tulane and its four chronologies.
Activity
IceAgeEcologist commentedon Dec 2, 2020
The issue arises from how radiocarbon chron controls are stored in Neotoma. Neotoma allows Chron Controls to be stored as a) radiocarbon dates or as b) calibrated radiocarbon dates. The Chronology age-depth plotter is pulling these dates as is, which for a) will cause visual misalignment with the calibrated-year age-depth redline. A good example is Lake Tulane and its four chronologies.