You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An automated security scanner (aardvark/codex) opened 13 PRs (#337-#349) against the repository. After principal-engineer review, 11 were validated as legitimate and 2 were rejected (one as security theater, one as destructive). The original PRs were closed due to provenance issues and are being re-implemented cleanly in a single PR.
Security theater: x-sandbox-id header is self-asserted with no cryptographic binding. Also breaks all existing callers since the sandbox client never sets the header. Needs redesign with per-sandbox certs or server-issued tokens.
Destructive: blocking AF_INET/AF_INET6 in proxy mode would break the proxy itself. Sandboxed processes must create inet sockets to reach the proxy at 10.200.0.1:3128. Network isolation is already enforced by the network namespace + iptables rules.
Agent Diagnostic
All 13 PRs were reviewed using the review-security-issue skill with principal-engineer-reviewer sub-agents. Each finding was traced through the codebase to validate or refute the claimed vulnerability, assess severity, and evaluate the proposed fix.
Activity
[-]fix(sandbox): L7 REST parser overread enables request smuggling[/-][+]Security hardening: remediate aardvark/codex scanner findings[/+]12 remaining items
fix: security hardening from aardvark/codex scanner findings (#352)
fix(server): preserve credential key names in redacted provider respo…
fix(server): preserve credential key names in redacted provider respo…