Skip to content

Store RileyLink Device ID in PumpEvent object #48

Closed

Description

@loudnate

Request from @ps2. What should be stored? Just the RileyLink's name?

Activity

  1. ps2 commented on Aug 2, 2016

    @ps2
    Collaborator

    I came around in our discussion. I think pumpID is the only thing required here. Is that already covered then as far as this ticket goes. There is still work in NightscoutUploadKit, to add pumpID.

  2. loudnate commented on Aug 2, 2016

    @loudnate
    CollaboratorAuthor

    I see pumpID in the device status uploading PR. So what should we use for the device ID? Or is that something you plan to remove?

  3. ps2 commented on Aug 2, 2016

    @ps2
    Collaborator

    For pump events / treatments, we don't need a 'device ID'. But as we discussed, tracking the pump that an event came from could be a very useful thing. I'd like to add this, even though it doesn't exist now.

    The pumpID in PumpStatus struct is to know which pump the battery/res/etc was reported for, when doing devicestatus uploads. This is not currently tracked either, but I'd like to add it.

    The device id for devicestatus entries is discussed here: LoopKit/Loop#98

  4. changed the title [-]Persist descriptive device identifier in PumpEvent object[/-] [+]Store RileyLink Device ID in PumpEvent object[/+] on Aug 2, 2016
  5. self-assigned this
    on Aug 2, 2016
  6. added this to the 0.5.0 milestone on Aug 2, 2016
  7. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Aug 2, 2016
    50d65f4
    15064b9
  8. loudnate commented on Aug 3, 2016

    @loudnate
    CollaboratorAuthor

    There was some confusion here on my part; it sounds like we don't need to store deviceID for nightscout.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions