Skip to content

Is this Repo dead? #242

Open
Open

Description

@KeeganOP

Is this repo still alive? Were looking for something to work with PDF's in python but are worried about long term support with this repo (new python versions specifically). Reasons being:

  1. Last commit more than a year ago
  2. @JazzCore inactive for more than a year
  3. Open issues not being addressed / looked into

Seeing as this repo has 1.8k stars and is used by 7.5k other repos (https://github.com/JazzCore/python-pdfkit/network/dependents) I would imagine this repo needs to be brought back to life or marked as deprecated.

Activity

  1. nikaro commented on Feb 7, 2023

    @nikaro

    wkhtmltopdf itself is not maintained: wkhtmltopdf/wkhtmltopdf#5160

  2. alessandro-massarenti commented on Mar 18, 2023

    @alessandro-massarenti

    wkhtmltopdf itself is not maintained: wkhtmltopdf/wkhtmltopdf#5160

    Saw that, is there another recommended library for html to pdf conversion?

  3. nikaro commented on Mar 19, 2023

    @nikaro

    Saw that, is there another recommended library for html to pdf conversion?

    @alessandro-massarenti i've personally tried Weasyprint and Playwright.

    Weasyprint develops its own rendering engine while Playwright uses headless Chromium. So with Playwright you have more "reliable" (in terms of HTML standard compliance) output. But Weasyprint is more lightweight and works well enough for simple layouts.

  4. RyuFeng commented on Apr 14, 2023

    @RyuFeng

    Weasyprint develops its own rendering engine while Playwright uses headless Chromium. So with Playwright you have more "reliable" (in terms of HTML standard compliance) output. But Weasyprint is more lightweight and works well enough for simple layouts.

    But weasyprint is quite slow if the no. of pages in the document increases to around 80-100. Is there any other alternative to it? pdfkit was quite faster in this case.

  5. nikaro commented on Apr 14, 2023

    @nikaro

    But weasyprint is quite slow if the no. of pages in the document increases to around 80-100. Is there any other alternative to it? pdfkit was quite faster in this case.

    Probably because it is a pure-Python lib, while pdfkit is a wrapper around wkhtmltopdf. Maybe Playwright will have better performances.

    I also stumbled across https://github.com/xhtml2pdf/xhtml2pdf recently, but i did not test it. If you do, feedback would be welcome.

  6. gaboAcosta commented on Apr 4, 2024

    @gaboAcosta

    hello, coming from xhtml2pdf, it has 1 maintainer, it's really limited in what it can or can't do, it doesn't work with CSS3, so that means you can't use things like bootstrap :(

  7. alanhamlett commented on May 13, 2024

    @alanhamlett
    Collaborator

    I have access to merge PRs, but since the wkhtmltopdf project announced it's unmaintained let's just use one of the newer alternatives available. I've personally moved to having Python execute a nodejs script running https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer to generate pdfs needing JavaScript execution support. For pages without JavaScript there's also https://github.com/Kozea/WeasyPrint.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions