Skip to content

When an error response from thirdshift, comes back, give the user a sample command to address the problem #53

Open

Description

@JacobStephens2

such as a local branch already existing for the issue needing to be deleted

Activity

  1. JacobStephens2 commented on Oct 17, 2026

    @JacobStephens2
    OwnerAuthor

    This was generated by AI during triage.

    Triage Notes

    Several errors already offer corrective commands, including missing git identity and the offer of a Base fix. The remaining request is broader than one missing message.

    Keep #120 for local branch/Worktree recovery, #295 for pushing a missing remote Base branch, and #588 for failed-Spec continuation. Those concrete requirements should not be lost by closing them under this umbrella.

    Next decision: identify any other error families this issue must cover, and whether this should become their tracking Spec or a bounded consistency pass after those fixes. Command examples should be correctly quoted and offered as operator guidance; thirdshift should not automatically delete branches or Worktrees.

  2. JacobStephens2 commented on Oct 25, 2026

    @JacobStephens2
    OwnerAuthor

    This was generated by AI during triage.

    Triage Notes

    What we've established so far:

    What we still need from you (@JacobStephens2):

    • Which other errors still lack a recovery command? Name them, or this closes as done.
  3. added
    needs-infoWaiting on reporter for more information
    and removed
    needs-triageMaintainer needs to evaluate this issue
    on Oct 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestneeds-infoWaiting on reporter for more information

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions