Repository navigation
Fix no-cluster incremental exclusion handling - #26
Draft
dajiaohuang wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
dajiaohuang wants to merge 1 commit into
dajiaohuang wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: dajiaohuang <mikewushuwen@outlook.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
When incremental extraction only excludes an existing file, detection reports it under
excluded_filesrather thandeleted_files. The--no-clusterno-change fast path ignored that list, pruned the graph, then printed that outputs were left untouched. Treat excluded files as changes so the normal incremental merge writes the updated graph and reports that write.Validation
cargo +1.95.0 fmt --checkcargo +1.95.0 test --locked --test no_cluster_excludescargo +1.95.0 clippy --locked --all-targets -- -D warnings