Skip to content

[dialogflow] flake: Operation did not complete within the designated timeout. #3490

Closed
Closed
[dialogflow] flake: Operation did not complete within the designated timeout.#3490
Assignees
tmatsuo
Labels
api: dialogflowIssues related to the Dialogflow API.priority: p2Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.type: bugError or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.

Description

@tmatsuo
tmatsuo
opened on Apr 23, 2020

build

Log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmpfs/src/github/python-docs-samples/dialogflow/cloud-client/create_document_test.py", line 53, in test_create_document
    'text/html', 'FAQ', 'https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/faq')
  File "/tmpfs/src/github/python-docs-samples/dialogflow/cloud-client/document_management.py", line 63, in create_document
    document = response.result(timeout=90)
  File "/tmpfs/src/github/python-docs-samples/dialogflow/cloud-client/.nox/py-3-7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/google/api_core/future/polling.py", line 125, in result
    self._blocking_poll(timeout=timeout)
  File "/tmpfs/src/github/python-docs-samples/dialogflow/cloud-client/.nox/py-3-7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/google/api_core/future/polling.py", line 107, in _blocking_poll
    "Operation did not complete within the designated " "timeout."
concurrent.futures._base.TimeoutError: Operation did not complete within the designated timeout.

Activity

  1. blunderbuss-gcf
    assigned
    kurtisvg
    on Apr 23, 2020
  2. kurtisvg
    added
    api: dialogflowIssues related to the Dialogflow API.
    type: bugError or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
    on Apr 24, 2020
  3. kurtisvg
    assigned
    nnegrey
    and unassigned
    kurtisvg
    on Apr 24, 2020
  4. tmatsuo
    added
    priority: p2Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.
    on Apr 24, 2020
  5. tmatsuo
    assigned
    tmatsuo
    and unassigned
    nnegrey
    on May 1, 2020

  6. tmatsuo commented on May 1, 2020

    @tmatsuo
    tmatsuo
    on May 1, 2020
    ContributorAuthor

    @nnegrey I'll take this and try to fix it tomorrow, but if you've already started working on this, feel free to take it back.

  7. tmatsuo
    added a commit that references this issue on May 2, 2020

    [dialogflow] fix: marking a test with flaky

    10cd0a1

  8. tmatsuo commented on May 2, 2020

    @tmatsuo
    tmatsuo
    on May 2, 2020
    ContributorAuthor

    Build cop bot caught it #3672

  9. tmatsuo
    closed this as completedon May 2, 2020
  10. tmatsuo
    added a commit that references this issue on May 5, 2020

    [dialogflow] fix: marking a test with flaky (#3671)

    00d8071
  11. telpirion
    added a commit that references this issue on Jan 18, 2023

    [dialogflow] fix: marking a test with flaky [(#3671)](#3671)

    3a0f680
  12. dandhlee
    added a commit that references this issue on Feb 6, 2023

    [dialogflow] fix: marking a test with flaky [(#3671)](#3671)

    36dc897
  13. telpirion
    added a commit that references this issue on Mar 13, 2023

    [dialogflow] fix: marking a test with flaky [(#3671)](#3671)

    535d61b
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

api: dialogflowIssues related to the Dialogflow API.priority: p2Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.type: bugError or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions