You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Rotate neo's current SNMP community, now that the overwrite route exists #232
SECURITY.md records that the MokerLink SNMP community turned up in a local
Claude Code session transcript on 2026-08-20, and that it was deliberately not
rotated:
The switch community deliberately was not: rotating it means the neo
residual above all over again.
That justification was correct at the time. Rotating neo would have added a
second stuck community row, because its firmware will not persist a deletion.
#231 removes the blocker: the
runbook now carries an overwrite-in-place route for this switch
(§2.5),
so a row can be retired without deleting it.
This one was found in a local transcript under ~/.claude/projects/,
mode 600, redacted in place, never committed and never synced off the host.
When to do it
The same window as #84, and only after #84's overwrite has been proven to
persist across a reboot. If the technique does not work, this issue goes away
again with it.
Sequenced after #84, this becomes: overwrite the second row with a fresh value,
set SNMP_COMMUNITY_MOKERLINK in SOPS, make render && make reload, then ./scripts/snmp-verify.sh --device neo and --old. Unlike #84, this one does
touch the repository and does have a window where monitoring is wrong, which is
another reason not to bundle it.
Duplicate of #84 — closing, and folding the substance back into it rather than losing it.
The distinction this issue drew: #84 is neo's previous community, the shared string that was committed to a public repository. This one was the current community, found 2026-08-20 in a local Claude Code transcript under ~/.claude/projects/, mode 600, redacted in place, never committed and never synced off the host. SECURITY.md deliberately left it unrotated because rotating it would have added a second stuck community row.
Treating both as #84 means #84's window covers both rows on the switch, in this order:
Overwrite the row holding the ex-public string with the current community. If the firmware takes the duplicate, neo answers exactly one string and nothing in the repo changes.
Only if that is proven to persist across a reboot, overwrite the second row with a fresh value, set SNMP_COMMUNITY_MOKERLINK in SOPS, then make render && make reload.
Step 2 is the part that was filed here. It is strictly lower priority than step 1 — a 600-mode local file is not a public repository — and unlike step 1 it touches the repository and has a window where monitoring is wrong. If the overwrite turns out not to persist, step 2 goes away with it.
Activity
Gerrrt commentedon Sep 1, 2026
Duplicate of #84 — closing, and folding the substance back into it rather than losing it.
The distinction this issue drew: #84 is
neo's previous community, the shared string that was committed to a public repository. This one was the current community, found 2026-08-20 in a local Claude Code transcript under~/.claude/projects/, mode 600, redacted in place, never committed and never synced off the host.SECURITY.mddeliberately left it unrotated because rotating it would have added a second stuck community row.Treating both as #84 means #84's window covers both rows on the switch, in this order:
neoanswers exactly one string and nothing in the repo changes.SNMP_COMMUNITY_MOKERLINKin SOPS, thenmake render && make reload.Step 2 is the part that was filed here. It is strictly lower priority than step 1 — a 600-mode local file is not a public repository — and unlike step 1 it touches the repository and has a window where monitoring is wrong. If the overwrite turns out not to persist, step 2 goes away with it.
The procedure for both is §2.5's MokerLink route, added in #231.