You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While reviewing PR #743, we found a support-matrix gap: AMD SEV-SNP support should not be described or implied as available on GCP. The current GCP deployment path is Intel TDX.
Current state
GCP docs and quickstart material are Intel TDX-focused.
AMD SEV-SNP support is separate from the GCP path and depends on supported SEV-SNP hosts/images.
Native TEE interface docs can mention AMD SEV-SNP generally, but provider-specific docs should make the GCP limitation explicit.
Tasks
Audit README and docs for text that could imply AMD SEV-SNP is supported on GCP.
Keep the support matrix explicit: GCP uses Intel TDX for now.
Document where AMD SEV-SNP is supported once the v0.6.0 SEV-SNP image line is ready for users.
Decide whether AMD SEV-SNP on GCP is a product goal. If yes, split follow-up work for provider/image/runtime prerequisites.
Resolved. The support matrix in the README is already explicit that GCP uses Intel TDX (README.md:178), and I've added a one-sentence note that AMD SEV-SNP is new/experimental and that Intel TDX is the production path (README.md:180).
The strategic question this issue raised — "is AMD SEV-SNP on GCP a product goal?" — is answered in #713's platform-strategy section: GCP SNP, if pursued, is a separate provider-vTPM backend, not an extension of the bare-metal launch-measurement recompute path. It is not a current target. Closing the doc-truth part here; that future backend lives in #713.
Activity
h4x3rotab commentedon Jun 29, 2026
Resolved. The support matrix in the README is already explicit that GCP uses Intel TDX (
README.md:178), and I've added a one-sentence note that AMD SEV-SNP is new/experimental and that Intel TDX is the production path (README.md:180).The strategic question this issue raised — "is AMD SEV-SNP on GCP a product goal?" — is answered in #713's platform-strategy section: GCP SNP, if pursued, is a separate provider-vTPM backend, not an extension of the bare-metal launch-measurement recompute path. It is not a current target. Closing the doc-truth part here; that future backend lives in #713.