Require explicit locales and charsets in tracer code by bric3 · Pull Request #13020 · DataDog/dd-trace-java

bric3 · 2026-10-23T16:15:38Z

What Does This Do

Require explicit locales and charsets for checked JDK APIs. Add Strings.format(...) in internal-api and use it for locale-independent formatting wherever that dependency already exists. Document intentional JVM defaults and the @SuppressForbidden escape hatch in the perf-review guide, with regression coverage for locale-independent configuration parsing and formatting.

Motivation

The tracer inherits the application's JVM defaults. Identifier case conversion, protocol data and machine-readable formatting need stable results across deployment locales and charsets.

Additional Notes

The signatures cover locale and charset defaults. The bundled jdk-unsafe rules also cover default time zones.
Module dependencies are unchanged. Lower-level modules keep explicit JDK overloads.
Local static-analysis validation excludes Maven instrumentation because the earlier run could not resolve org.sonatype.sisu:sisu-guice:3.1.0:no_aop.

Contributor Checklist

Format the title according to the contribution guidelines
Assign the type: and (comp: or inst:) labels in addition to any other useful labels
Avoid using close, fix, or any linking keywords when referencing an issue
Use solves instead, and assign the PR milestone to the issue
Update the CODEOWNERS file on source file addition, migration, or deletion
Update public documentation with any new configuration flags or behaviors
Once approved, use merge queue to merge the PR

datadog-prod-us1-3 · 2026-10-23T16:34:12Z

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 67.35%
• Overall Coverage: 59.48% (+0.02%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 785aff6 | Docs | Give us feedback!}

pr-commenter · 2026-10-23T16:38:25Z

Debugger benchmarks

Parameters

	Baseline	Candidate
baseline_or_candidate	baseline	candidate
ci_job_date	1793106093	1793106419
end_time	2026-10-27T13:03:00	2026-10-27T13:08:27
git_branch	master	bdu/explicit-locale-charset
git_commit_sha	`732a7fe`	`785aff6`
start_time	2026-10-27T13:01:34	2026-10-27T13:07:00

See matching parameters

	Baseline	Candidate
ci_job_id	2180250000	2180250000
ci_pipeline_id	147797012	147797012
cpu_model	Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz
git_commit_date	1793105387	1793105387

Summary

Found 5 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 5 metrics, 5 unstable metrics.

scenario	Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_min	Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p50	Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p75	Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p99	Δ mean throughput
scenario:loop	better [-565.171µs; -469.509µs] or [-7.037%; -5.846%]	better [-562.989µs; -466.053µs] or [-6.956%; -5.759%]	better [-565.682µs; -468.505µs] or [-6.959%; -5.763%]	better [-557.700µs; -419.849µs] or [-6.789%; -5.111%]	better [+6.286op/s; +9.551op/s] or [+5.155%; +7.832%]

See unchanged results

scenario	Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_min	Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p50	Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p75	Δ mean agg_http_req_duration_p99	Δ mean throughput
scenario:noprobe	unstable [-24.543µs; +37.403µs] or [-7.822%; +11.921%]	unstable [-33.204µs; +53.984µs] or [-9.563%; +15.548%]	unstable [-42.139µs; +67.969µs] or [-11.657%; +18.802%]	unstable [-104.206µs; +113.532µs] or [-8.770%; +9.555%]	same
scenario:basic	same	same	same	unstable [-177.906µs; +65.677µs] or [-15.051%; +5.556%]	same

Request duration reports for reports

gantt
    title reports - request duration [CI 0.99] : candidate=None, baseline=None
    dateFormat X
    axisFormat %s
section baseline
noprobe (347.219 µs) : 313, 381
.   : milestone, 347,
basic (325.935 µs) : 320, 331
.   : milestone, 326,
loop (8.093 ms) : 8030, 8157
.   : milestone, 8093,
section candidate
noprobe (357.609 µs) : 310, 405
.   : milestone, 358,
basic (323.607 µs) : 318, 330
.   : milestone, 324,
loop (7.579 ms) : 7572, 7585
.   : milestone, 7579,

baseline results

Scenario	Request median duration [CI 0.99]
noprobe	347.219 µs [313.474 µs, 380.963 µs]
basic	325.935 µs [320.385 µs, 331.486 µs]
loop	8.093 ms [8.03 ms, 8.157 ms]

candidate results

Scenario	Request median duration [CI 0.99]
noprobe	357.609 µs [309.724 µs, 405.494 µs]
basic	323.607 µs [317.59 µs, 329.624 µs]
loop	7.579 ms [7.572 ms, 7.585 ms]

dd-octo-sts · 2026-10-23T16:42:11Z

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite	Status
Startup	🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results

Scenario	Candidate	master	Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent	13.98 s	14.01 s	[-1.0%; +0.5%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent	12.90 s	12.95 s	[-1.0%; +0.2%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent	17.18 s	17.08 s	[-0.3%; +1.4%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent	17.06 s	16.92 s	[-0.1%; +1.8%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent	16.77 s	16.79 s	[-1.3%; +1.1%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent	17.12 s	16.42 s	[-0.1%; +8.7%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent	16.15 s	16.17 s	[-1.0%; +0.8%] (no difference)

Commit: 785aff60 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI

Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

pr-commenter · 2026-10-26T18:24:00Z

Kafka / producer-benchmark

Parameters

	Baseline	Candidate
baseline_or_candidate	baseline	candidate
git_branch	master	bdu/explicit-locale-charset
git_commit_date	1793033870	1793091770
git_commit_sha	`e7584c7`	`4840b5d`

See matching parameters

	Baseline	Candidate
ci_job_date	1793093058	1793093058
ci_job_id	2179369988	2179369988
ci_pipeline_id	147738892	147738892
cpu_model	Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8175M CPU @ 2.50GHz	Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8175M CPU @ 2.50GHz
jdkVersion	11.0.31	11.0.31
jmhVersion	1.36	1.36
jvm	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java
jvmArgs	-Dhttp.proxyHost=127.0.0.1 -Dhttp.proxyPort=15002 -Dhttps.proxyHost=127.0.0.1 -Dhttps.proxyPort=15002 -Dhttp.nonProxyHosts=localhost	*.localhost
kernel_version	Linux runner-zfyrx7zua-project-304-concurrent-0-m6xogzdg 6.8.0-1031-aws #33~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 26 14:22:30 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux	Linux runner-zfyrx7zua-project-304-concurrent-0-m6xogzdg 6.8.0-1031-aws #33~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 26 14:22:30 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
vmName	OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM	OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
vmVersion	11.0.31+11-post-1ubuntu1-22.04.2-Ubuntu	11.0.31+11-post-1ubuntu1-22.04.2-Ubuntu

Summary

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 3 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

See unchanged results

scenario	Δ mean throughput
scenario:not-instrumented/KafkaProduceBenchmark.benchProduce	same
scenario:only-tracing-dsm-disabled-benchmarks/KafkaProduceBenchmark.benchProduce	same
scenario:only-tracing-dsm-enabled-benchmarks/KafkaProduceBenchmark.benchProduce	unsure [+1032.641op/s; +7974.792op/s] or [+0.842%; +6.505%]

pr-commenter · 2026-10-26T18:37:27Z

Kafka / consumer-benchmark

Parameters

	Baseline	Candidate
baseline_or_candidate	baseline	candidate
git_branch	master	bdu/explicit-locale-charset
git_commit_date	1793033870	1793105387
git_commit_sha	`e7584c7`	`785aff6`

See matching parameters

	Baseline	Candidate
ci_job_date	1793106649	1793106649
ci_job_id	2180249999	2180249999
ci_pipeline_id	147797012	147797012
cpu_model	Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz
jdkVersion	11.0.31	11.0.31
jmhVersion	1.36	1.36
jvm	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java
jvmArgs	-Dhttp.proxyHost=127.0.0.1 -Dhttp.proxyPort=15002 -Dhttps.proxyHost=127.0.0.1 -Dhttps.proxyPort=15002 -Dhttp.nonProxyHosts=localhost	*.localhost
kernel_version	Linux runner-zfyrx7zua-project-304-concurrent-0-rwho6jd7 6.8.0-1031-aws #33~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 26 14:22:30 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux	Linux runner-zfyrx7zua-project-304-concurrent-0-rwho6jd7 6.8.0-1031-aws #33~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 26 14:22:30 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
vmName	OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM	OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
vmVersion	11.0.31+11-post-1ubuntu1-22.04.2-Ubuntu	11.0.31+11-post-1ubuntu1-22.04.2-Ubuntu

Summary

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 3 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

See unchanged results

scenario	Δ mean throughput
scenario:not-instrumented/KafkaConsumerBenchmark.benchConsume	same
scenario:only-tracing-dsm-disabled-benchmarks/KafkaConsumerBenchmark.benchConsume	same
scenario:only-tracing-dsm-enabled-benchmarks/KafkaConsumerBenchmark.benchConsume	unsure [-7184.985op/s; -188.067op/s] or [-3.813%; -0.100%]

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-10-27T14:33:17Z

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-27T14:36:58.615663Z	`785aff6`	Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-27T14:37:46.652524Z	`785aff6`	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

datadog-prod-us1-3

More details

The explicit locale and charset choices are consistent with their callers and build constraints. Confidence is limited to static analysis; tests were not run.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit 785aff6}

jpbempel

LGTM for debugger

dougqh · 2026-10-28T15:22:26Z

On the "keep the default" sites, the useful split seems to be who owns the bytes: us (→ UTF-8), a spec (→ spec charset), or an external party (→ their encoding). Since JDK 18, Charset.defaultCharset() is always UTF-8 and the OS encoding lives in native.encoding, so a couple of the new comments describe something the code doesn't do:

PrintStreamWrapper(PrintStream): super(ps) re-encodes with defaultCharset(), so it doesn't preserve the wrapped stream's encoding (on JDK 18+ with a non-UTF-8 console it writes UTF-8 into it). This was already the case, but the comment now says it's deliberate.
The log capture file feeds the flare, which we read, so UTF-8 seems like the right choice rather than platform for compatibility.
Git output: LocalFSGitInfoExtractor now decodes as UTF-8, but ShellCommandExecutor still uses defaultCharset() for git output. git's log output defaults to UTF-8, so the two readers can disagree on JDK ≤17 with a non-UTF-8 default.

Would a small nativeCharset() helper (native.encoding, falling back to the default) make sense for the genuinely OS-owned subprocess cases? It would also give developers who hit the new forbidden-API error an obvious choice. Also, the locale @defaultMessage could mention Strings.format so people find it.

refactor: require explicit locales and charsets

0b20b7b

bric3 added tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM comp: core Tracer core type: refactoring tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes labels Oct 23, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector

bric3 requested a review from dougqh October 23, 2026 16:21

eliottness mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2026

Stop trusting compromised eMudhra roots in the exploration-tests image #13026

Merged

bric3 added 2 commits October 26, 2026 18:32

chore: sync locale guardrail with master

6db42c0

refactor: centralise locale-independent formatting

9a8f99f

bric3 added 2 commits October 27, 2026 10:02

fix: remove redundant Groovy Locale import

4840b5d

chore: trim locale guardrail docs and tests

785aff6

bric3 marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2026 14:33

bric3 requested review from a team as code owners October 27, 2026 14:33

bric3 removed the request for review from a team October 27, 2026 14:33

bric3 requested review from ValentinZakharov, jandro996, tylfin and vpellan and removed request for a team October 27, 2026 14:33

datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot reviewed Oct 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

jpbempel approved these changes Oct 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Require explicit locales and charsets in tracer code - #13020

Require explicit locales and charsets in tracer code#13020
bric3 wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
bdu/explicit-locale-charset

bric3 commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

jpbempel left a comment

Uh oh!

dougqh commented Oct 28, 2026

Uh oh!

This branch has not been deployed

Reviewers

Uh oh!

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Conversation

bric3 commented Oct 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 • edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Debugger benchmarks

Parameters

Summary

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Kafka / producer-benchmark

Parameters

Summary

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Kafka / consumer-benchmark

Parameters

Summary

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codex Review Summary

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jpbempel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

dougqh commented Oct 28, 2026

Uh oh!

This branch has not been deployed

Reviewers

Uh oh!

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

bric3 commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot

Loading

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading