Repository navigation
Promql query attribution - #3300
Conversation
# Conflicts: # packages/app/src/hooks/useChartConfig.tsx
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: fbdfc73 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Duplicate code analysisNo new duplicate code introduced by this PR. jscpd compared this branch against |
|
E2E Test Results✅ All tests passed • 398 passed • 1 skipped • 1164s
Tests ran across 4 shards in parallel. |
🟡 Tier 3 — StandardIntroduces new logic, modifies core functionality, or touches areas with non-trivial risk. Why this tier:
Additional context: touches the query rendering engine lightly (93 lines, under the 150-line bar for Tier 4) Review process: Full human review — logic, architecture, edge cases. Stats
|
PR Review✅ No issues found. |
Deep ReviewScope: PR #3300 "Promql query attribution" — extends query-attribution tracking from SQL to PromQL. The browser sends an ✅ No critical issues found. The attribution path is defensively built and well-covered: browser values are an allowlist-sanitized hint re-encoded by 🟡 P2 — recommended
🔵 P3 nitpicks (2)
Reviewers (2): previous-comments, orchestrator diff analysis (correctness/security/reliability/api-contract/testing lenses) Note on coverage: Of the dispatched reviewer fan-out, the previous-comments reviewer returned (clean — prior feedback verified as addressed); the remaining lens agents had not reported before output was finalized. The findings above reflect the orchestrator's own verified read of the full diff and supporting modules ( Testing gaps: No unit-level assertion that No finding blocks merge automatically. A maintainer will expect P0/P1 findings in code this PR changes to be fixed; P2/P3 are your call -- fix or reply. Never fix findings about surrounding code here; reply instead. Do not widen the PR. How to respond |
pulpdrew
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM besides the one question
Summary
follow up of #3155, expanding the coverage from just SQL queries to promql ones too
Screenshots or video
How to test on Vercel preview
Preview routes:
Steps:
References