Repository navigation
date the two counts the 116 formula hand-types - #3163
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The provider formula read "the identical 493-pair gTrade registry; Gains
has delisted 315, Nova none" with no date. Both numbers move: the
registry grows and Gains delists more pairs, and an undated count in a
field readers see in the table goes quietly false.
The repo dates this kind of claim everywhere else, including the bullet
right above this one ("listed 355 Gains pairs where 178 can be opened
today") and bench 271's bands ("Hyperliquid 0.5x ... on 2026-09-22"). The
methodology bullet for this row already carried the date; the formula did
not. Reworded so both counts sit behind "on 2026-10-22", at 228 of the
240 characters the schema allows.
Found auditing my own prose against the editorial rules before this goes
to production. No em dashes and no marketing adjectives in the 32 added
spec lines; this was the one real finding.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Same one-line change as the commit in #3160, ported to
devso the two trees stay identical.Bench 116's Nova provider formula read "the identical 493-pair gTrade registry; Gains has delisted 315, Nova none" with no date. Both numbers move as the registry grows and Gains delists more pairs, and an undated count in a field readers see in the table goes quietly false.
The repo dates this kind of claim everywhere else, including the methodology bullet directly above it ("listed 355 Gains pairs where 178 can be opened today") and bench 271's bands ("Hyperliquid 0.5x ... on 2026-09-22"). This row's methodology bullet already carried the date; its formula did not.
Reworded so both counts sit behind "on 2026-10-22", 228 of the 240 characters the schema allows.
Found auditing my own prose against the editorial rules before shipping to production. The 32 added spec lines carry no em dashes and no marketing adjectives; this was the one real finding.