You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Request for Python API and ponder time examples #6
First of all amazing work on this, I've been a big fan of Maia1/2 and playing against 3 online feels much more human!
Firstly, I was wondering if you would be able to provide some examples on using maia3 as a python package similar to maia2? The UCI interface isn't sufficient for what I'm trying to do, and am trying to reverse engineer things but probably a nicer way!
Secondly, from what I can tell, you are actively modelling ponder/move times (IE how long a human would take to make a move)? The ponder head doesn't seem to be giving me very good results, hoping you can advise.
I notice include_time_info is always set to false in the configs, do the released models support the time feature during inference?
The models on Huggingface all were trained with --include_time_info=false and do not support ponder time prediction. I have pushed changes at https://github.com/daniel-monroe/maia3/tree/rmponder that set the ponder value to 0 for base models, in addition to the maia3-23m-ponder model which does accepts time control information and outputs ponder predictions and is currently used by the maia website. We are discussing a package at the moment and will continue to work on this.
Amazing, thank you @daniel-monroe! I believe UCI supports an info dict in the results, this may be a good place to include the ponder information if you wish to support it via the existing API.
Will play around with the 23m ponder model! Thanks again :D
Activity
daniel-monroe commentedon May 31, 2026
Hi Torbet,
The models on Huggingface all were trained with
--include_time_info=falseand do not support ponder time prediction. I have pushed changes at https://github.com/daniel-monroe/maia3/tree/rmponder that set the ponder value to 0 for base models, in addition to themaia3-23m-pondermodel which does accepts time control information and outputs ponder predictions and is currently used by the maia website. We are discussing a package at the moment and will continue to work on this.Torbet commentedon May 31, 2026
Amazing, thank you @daniel-monroe! I believe UCI supports an
infodict in the results, this may be a good place to include the ponder information if you wish to support it via the existing API.Will play around with the 23m ponder model! Thanks again :D