Skip to content

[Snyk] Fix for 2 vulnerabilities - #54

Open
AH7 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-851f7c3b8659ac9363a575459de52142
Open

AH7 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-851f7c3b8659ac9363a575459de52142

Conversation

@AH7

@AH7 AH7 commented Sep 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Uncontrolled Recursion
SNYK-JS-BRACES-19963945
  721  
high severity Infinite loop
SNYK-JS-URIJS-19963963
  721  

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: High

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Uncontrolled Recursion

@AH7

AH7 commented Sep 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Merge Risk: High

This upgrade includes multiple major version jumps with significant breaking changes. The two most impactful are jsonld and rdflib, both of which have modernized their APIs, requiring developer action. The solid-permissions package is deprecated and should be replaced.

Top 3 Impactful Upgrades

1. jsonld: 0.4.12 → 5.0.0 (HIGH RISK)

This is a very large version jump across multiple major releases, introducing several critical breaking changes. Code modifications are required.

  • Asynchronous API Change: Support for callbacks has been removed in favor of Promises and async/await since v2.0.0. This is a fundamental change to how asynchronous operations are handled and will require refactoring.
  • Node.js Version Support: Version 5.0.0 drops support for Node.js versions below 12.
  • Dependencies & Behavior: The internal document loader was switched from request to @digitalbazaar/http-client, and the default processing mode is now json-ld-1.1. The underlying rdf-canonize dependency also has breaking changes that may alter the output of jsonld.normalize().

Source: GitHub Changelog

Recommendation: Plan for significant refactoring to adopt the Promise-based API. Ensure your Node.js version is 12 or higher. Review code that relies on document loading or canonicalization for behavioral changes.

2. rdflib: 0.12.3 → 2.2.1 (HIGH RISK)

This is a massive version upgrade for this RDF library. While a complete changelog for this entire range is not available, the age of the starting version and common JavaScript modernization patterns indicate a high likelihood of breaking changes.

  • Likely Asynchronous API Change: Older versions of similar libraries relied on callbacks for asynchronous operations like parsing and serializing. It is highly probable that the library has since migrated to a modern Promise-based API, which would be a major breaking change.
  • Large Version Gap: The jump from v0.12.x to v2.2.x spans many years of development. It is unsafe to assume any level of API compatibility.

Source: Package documentation

Recommendation: Treat this as a migration to a new library. Carefully review the current rdflib.js documentation and refactor your implementation to match the modern API, paying close attention to asynchronous methods.

3. solid-permissions: 0.4.2 → 0.5.1 (HIGH RISK)

This package was archived in 2019 and is deprecated. The README explicitly recommends migrating to acl-check.js.

Source: GitHub Repository

Recommendation: Migrate from

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants