Skip to content

May 4-5 2017, Berlin: Schedule #41

Closed

Description

@addaleax

Collab Summit Berlin

May 4-5, 2017
co.up Coworking
Adalbertstraße 8
10999 Berlin, Germany

To get in, go through the big metal gate to the left of Adalbertstr. 7, straight to the far end of the courtyard, and in the first tunnel to your right. Ring the doorbell marked "co.up Coworking UG"

View the Collab Summit Berlin Project Board to schedule your working group and register yourself to attend!

Organizers

Anyone can come, but we will not be explicitly onboarding at Collab 
Summit Berlin. Conversations can move fast as working groups have 
a lot of context. This Spring instance of Collab Summit will not include
a morning Code + Learn to learn how to contribute prior to congregating
for the summit. Please look to the Fall Collab Summit in Vancouver, BC 
for this pairing.  

Working groups will put together a brief schedule so that people can 
familiarize themselves before folks get onsite, having the general collaborator 
discussions, and then dive into breakout sessions.

Working groups in attendance

We'd love to know ahead who will be represented. Filing issues in this repo is helpful for discussion particular to a working group and how they'd like to manage their time. Linking to that here would be great! We're working on creating a Projects Board to post times for this on the conf agenda so people are aware of when a WG meets and can maybe get a break, if needed. We'll be looking at issues filed in this repo titled "Berlin: working group something something" to add these below as well.

  • Working group that will be at Collaboration Summit
    • Name of contact @github-handle
    • link to working group planning issue
    • Any extra requests(space during conf, av/sound, etc.)

Day-of Agenda

May. 4, 2017

  • 09:00-10:00 Introduction and presentations pertinent to majority of audience
  • 10:00 - 12:00 Working group breakouts
  • 12:00-13:00 Lunch break (not provided)
  • 13:00-17:00 Working group breakouts

Sign up for breakout tables or room HERE.

May 5, 2017

  • 09:00-12:00 Collaborator gathering
  • 12:00-13:00 Lunch break (not provided)
  • 13:00-17:00 Working group breakouts

Sign up for breakout tables or room HERE.

AV Setup

TBD(asked the venue, waiting to hear back)

The venue

The venue

  • Seven tables in the big room (±155sqm) that can seat 6-8 people each, with 20 office chairs, 50 wooden chairs, a corner with a couch & a few soft chairs.
  • Smaller meeting room(15sqm) seats 6-8 people.
  • Welcome to move around the furniture according to your needs!

Day One Collaboration Summit:

  • intro setup: chairs for everyone
  • afternoon setup: tables pulled out for working groups to meet

Day Two Collaboration Summit:(TBD)
Tables pulled out for working groups to discuss work.

@nodejs/collaborators @nodejs/v8 @nodejs/ctc @nodejs/tsc @nodejs/community-committee We should figure out what topics we want to cover.

Things that were mentioned in #39:

… what else? No doubt there’s enough ground to cover here.

Activity

  1. calvinmetcalf commented on Apr 5, 2017

    @calvinmetcalf

    streams wg meeting came up here originally nodejs/readable-stream#261 (comment)

  2. mhdawson commented on Apr 6, 2017

    @mhdawson
    Member

    Depending on who is going to be there a session on post-mortem would be useful.

  3. mcollina commented on Apr 6, 2017

    @mcollina
    Member

    Here is our agenda for the in-person meeting (or at least my proposal): nodejs/readable-stream#275. I can update at the top if you want.

  4. yunong commented on Apr 6, 2017

    @yunong

    @mhdawson I might be able to attend and would definitely want to talk about post-mortem, I wonder if the Microsoft folks will be attending, since they've been working on similar tooling for Chakra.

    In general, I'd also want to talk about HTTP/2 and ABI if there are enough folks around.

  5. Trott commented on Apr 6, 2017

    @Trott
    Contributor

    Not exactly Collaborator Summit stuff necessarily, but If some small number of streams folks want to tackle all the remaining bits of nodejs/node#445, that would be awesome. It's been open for more than 2 years, but it also seems achievable.

  6. addaleax commented on Apr 11, 2017

    @addaleax
    ContributorAuthor

    I wonder if the Microsoft folks will be attending, since they've been working on similar tooling for Chakra.

    @nodejs/chakracore @nodejs/node-chakracore fyi ^^^

  7. hackygolucky commented on Apr 11, 2017

    @hackygolucky
    Contributor

    Planning doc for the event started here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ai9n0fpYE-3GnUAMKp1U8OdGOtUoQCpzQTBMAwIHXWA/edit# for folks to chime in!

    Once this is hashed out, we'll put the info back in here. Easier discovery of information in GH.

  8. aruneshchandra commented on Apr 11, 2017

    @aruneshchandra

    I wonder if the Microsoft folks will be attending, since they've been working on similar tooling for Chakra.

    @yunong @addaleax - Unfortunately @nodejs/node-chakracore team will not be able to make it to this summit, but we would love to meet up at NodeSummit if folks are available.

  9. nebrius commented on Apr 13, 2017

    @nebrius

    The community committee is still fleshing out agenda ideas at nodejs/community-committee#28, but we will definitely be there with sessions!

  10. joyeecheung commented on Apr 17, 2017

    @joyeecheung
    Collaborator

    Just noticed nodejs/node#11273 might need some attention during the summit (if the proposed direction is approved in the next CTC meetings). It has been a bit stalled and there are many related PRs still open.

  11. fhinkel commented on Apr 18, 2017

    @fhinkel
    Contributor

    Are any @nodejs/benchmarking folks at the summit?

  12. gareth-ellis commented on Apr 18, 2017

    @gareth-ellis

    I'm not going to be able to make it. unfortunately

  13. piccoloaiutante commented on Apr 18, 2017

    @piccoloaiutante

    the @nodejs/build is planning an in person session too. Do we still need to book a room for a 2 hours session as it has been done here @williamkapke ?

  14. mikeal commented on Apr 19, 2017

    @mikeal
    Contributor

    I've added the members team to this repo so that we can try and use the Project board for scheduling :)

  15. hackygolucky commented on Apr 19, 2017

    @hackygolucky
    Contributor

    Hey all! Added some more finalized details to the Issue description, feel free to edit the issue and add your WG details in the appropriate area. We're working on the Project board that @mikeal mentioned above.

  16. 8 remaining items

  17. fhinkel commented on Apr 26, 2017

    @fhinkel
    Contributor

    @mhdawson I added a sheet (May2017) to the doc. I'd say go ahead an sign up.

  18. mhdawson commented on Apr 26, 2017

    @mhdawson
    Member

    @fhinkel Thanks !

  19. hackygolucky commented on Apr 26, 2017

    @hackygolucky
    Contributor

    @mhdawson @fhinkel I update the issue and the Projects board to reflect for open tables and the side room available. This was in the hopes that more people would pay attention if we kept everything in GitHub, since last time with the spreadsheet we had a lot of last minute meetings schedule that conflicted with one another and meant some folks couldn't attend all the meetings they wanted to participate in. I've transferred all the working groups that had already signed up in the spreadsheet though!

    I've also linked the registration form in the Collab Summit Berlin Projects Board, since we need everyone to register(it's free of course!) to make sure we have enough space.

  20. hybrist commented on Apr 26, 2017

    @hybrist

    Clicking on the "Signup HERE", I see "This event is not live" - is that expected?

  21. mhdawson commented on Apr 27, 2017

    @mhdawson
    Member

    @hackygolucky works for me, moved the N-API one after discussion with the rest of the team so they can call in.

  22. hackygolucky commented on Apr 28, 2017

    @hackygolucky
    Contributor

    @jkrems No that was not expected, ugh. Fixed. 🤦‍♀️

  23. hackygolucky commented on Apr 28, 2017

    @hackygolucky
    Contributor

    As updated above, View the Collab Summit Berlin Project Board to schedule your working group and register yourself to attend! cc @nodejs/tsc @nodejs/ctc @nodejs/build @nodejs/website @nodejs/evangelism @nodejs/community-committee @nodejs/security-wg (is there a better way to @ all the working groups?)

  24. addaleax commented on Apr 28, 2017

    @addaleax
    ContributorAuthor

    is there a better way to @ all the working groups?

    Well, there’s @nodejs/members for pinging everyone … 😄 (If you’re seeing this notification without context, this thread might be interesting for you if you’re in Berlin next week)

  25. jasnell commented on May 2, 2017

    @jasnell
    Contributor

    I've added a couple of agenda items for HTTP/2, Promises, and TC-39 Related matters. PTAL :-)

  26. nebrius commented on May 2, 2017

    @nebrius

    I grabbed the small room for CommComm during the first session on the first day. I figure we can use this to figure out goals/scope for CommComm during collab summit (and hopefully short to medium term goals for the group as a whole over the coming months).

  27. watson commented on May 3, 2017

    @watson

    I'll be attending as well. Anyone who wants to talk about diagnostics, debugging, APM etc let me know 😃 /cc @nodejs/diagnostics

  28. hackygolucky commented on May 3, 2017

    @hackygolucky
    Contributor

    If folks are having trouble finding the venue from the street(I've quoted the directions from the street into the courtyard gate above), please @ me or other folks you know are already onsite on Twitter(my handle is the same on Twitter).

  29. RichardLitt commented on May 4, 2017

    @RichardLitt
    Contributor

    Heard about this yesterday, am here to represent @nodeschool mainly. Here for the community stuff. \o/

  30. PatrickHeneise commented on May 5, 2017

    @PatrickHeneise

    Just arrived, also here for community / NodeConf /cc @RichardLitt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions